WEBVTT
00:00:05.759 --> 00:00:07.599
Hey there, welcome back to the podcast.
00:00:07.599 --> 00:00:09.759
I'm your host, Molly McPherson.
00:00:09.759 --> 00:00:14.880
This is an episode where we are going to do what we like to do here on this podcast.
00:00:14.880 --> 00:00:24.480
Take a real crisis, uncover some of the human failure underneath them, and then figure out what the crisis can teach the rest of us.
00:00:24.480 --> 00:00:33.280
I want to talk about a moment that stopped me mid-scroll today, Wednesday, March 4th, at the time of this recording.
00:00:33.280 --> 00:00:41.439
Kristi Noem, the Secretary of Homeland Security, sitting in a congressional hearing, being asked a direct yes or no question.
00:00:41.439 --> 00:00:48.880
A question I have been wondering for a while now, when is someone going to ask it?
00:00:48.880 --> 00:00:51.920
The last seven days I've been traveling for a client.
00:00:51.920 --> 00:01:13.680
So when I was on the plane yesterday and I could finally really catch up in the news and go deep, I was watching a lot of the clips of Christy Gnome testifying before Congress because, as the Homeland Security Secretary, she now is under intense bipartisan scrutiny, not just Democrat, bipartisan, over two fatal shootings of the U.S.
00:01:13.680 --> 00:01:17.120
citizens by ICE in Minneapolis.
00:01:17.120 --> 00:01:24.640
And of course, her broader mass deportation crackdown and also a partial shutdown of DHS funding.
00:01:24.640 --> 00:01:36.400
There was even some deep, deep scrutiny and judgment around an over $2 million ad campaign where we saw Christy Gnome at all these airports.
00:01:36.400 --> 00:01:44.959
So far, senators in both parties have grilled her for initially branding the dead protesters as domestic terrorists.
00:01:44.959 --> 00:01:49.840
That includes Senator Amy Klobuchar from Minnesota.
00:01:49.840 --> 00:02:07.760
And despite video and eyewitness accounts that completely undercut that claim, she still, as she testifies, refuses to retract or apologize while insisting that she relied on these chaotic early reports from agents on the ground.
00:02:07.760 --> 00:02:12.319
Everything that she has been saying doesn't make sense.
00:02:12.319 --> 00:02:23.039
Or if it makes everything she's been saying makes sense in her mind because she is following, no doubt, talking points.
00:02:23.039 --> 00:02:26.400
I mean, you can see it in her head, how her head is working.
00:02:26.400 --> 00:02:39.520
But everything is about undercutting a claim, refusing to retract, refusing to apologize, refusing to say anything to Alex Predi or Renee Good's family.
00:02:39.520 --> 00:02:42.080
She called Alex Predi a domestic terrorist.
00:02:42.080 --> 00:02:45.120
That's what Senator Klobuchar was asking her to say.
00:02:45.120 --> 00:02:51.360
And she just refused to admit it, even though we all saw on the video that she did.
00:02:51.360 --> 00:02:52.879
That's the setup.
00:02:52.879 --> 00:03:04.319
But today, in this hearing, it got worse because there was one of the biggest dodges that I've seen that put yesterday's dodges to shame.
00:03:04.319 --> 00:03:08.400
Because that's what I really want to talk about in today's episode.
00:03:08.400 --> 00:03:16.639
Because what happened in that room today is one of the clearest demonstrations of how not to handle a hard question.
00:03:16.639 --> 00:03:21.599
And the lesson applies to anyone, not just cabinet secretaries.
00:03:21.599 --> 00:03:23.199
It applies to all of us.
00:03:23.199 --> 00:03:31.439
If you're cornered or if you know someone and they are Christy gnoming you, I want to give you some advice for that.
00:03:31.439 --> 00:03:33.280
So let's get into it.
00:03:33.280 --> 00:03:42.319
To understand why that hearing room was primed and ready, you need to know what had been happening in the weeks before.
00:03:42.319 --> 00:03:47.360
Now, Gnome has had a rumored relationship with Corey Lewandowski.
00:03:47.360 --> 00:03:49.439
He is her alleged boyfriend.
00:03:49.439 --> 00:03:53.919
He's also, I have air quotes, a special government employee working at the White House.
00:03:53.919 --> 00:03:56.800
They are both married to other people.
00:03:56.800 --> 00:04:01.759
Chrissy Gnome's husband was there for the testimony about Corey Lewandowski.
00:04:01.759 --> 00:04:06.400
And Corey Lewandowski lives in New Hampshire with his wife.
00:04:06.400 --> 00:04:13.120
This is his wife's second marriage because she used to be married to a man who was killed on 9-11.
00:04:13.120 --> 00:04:16.560
He was originally from, I believe, Lowell, Massachusetts.
00:04:16.560 --> 00:04:20.079
So she is a, not just a widow, but she's a tragic widow.
00:04:20.079 --> 00:04:23.519
And this woman is married to Corey Lewandowski.
00:04:23.519 --> 00:04:27.120
And there have been so many whispers around Washington, D.C.
00:04:27.120 --> 00:04:29.759
about these two together.
00:04:29.759 --> 00:04:34.720
The relationship, to put it diplomatically, one of the worst kept secrets in Washington.
00:04:34.720 --> 00:04:38.319
They've been spotted together at parties, leaving each other's apartments.
00:04:38.319 --> 00:04:41.040
Also now that they live on military housing.
00:04:41.040 --> 00:04:44.079
They're essentially just moving into where Coast Guard housing should be.
00:04:44.079 --> 00:04:53.519
The situation has become such an open joke that Noam was actually mocked online for bringing her husband to the White House event instead of Lundowski.
00:04:53.519 --> 00:04:54.879
So that's the backdrop.
00:04:54.879 --> 00:05:05.279
Now, here's an incident that I think made the whispers louder into an open conversation that ended up in the hearing today.
00:05:05.279 --> 00:05:16.800
I briefly mentioned this on a social media post a couple weeks back when Gnome's deputy press secretary, Trish McLaughlin, stepped down, air quotes again.
00:05:16.800 --> 00:05:19.439
So we don't know what happened behind that.
00:05:19.439 --> 00:05:32.319
But I had mentioned very briefly that there was an incident with Gnome and Corey Lewandowski on a government trip and it involved a Coast Guard plane.
00:05:32.319 --> 00:05:41.759
So her plane, so now she gets to fly around, Coast Guard plane, DHS, Coast Guard, the United States Coast Guard and FEMA fall under DHS.
00:05:41.759 --> 00:05:48.560
Her plane had maintenance issues and she had to switch aircraft like mid-trip.
00:05:48.560 --> 00:05:54.720
During that switch, a allegedly a bag got left behind on the first plane.
00:05:54.720 --> 00:06:02.240
It was reported that it was a blanket, but now there are reports saying that it was a bag.
00:06:02.240 --> 00:06:08.399
And I didn't see this widespread, but I'm just going to tell you what I read in a website.
00:06:08.399 --> 00:06:17.519
So this is from The New Republic, and the headline is: turns out Christy Gnome's plane freak out wasn't over a blanket.
00:06:17.519 --> 00:06:23.199
Homeland Security Secretary Christy Gnome's blanket fiasco may not have been about a blanket at all.
00:06:23.199 --> 00:06:40.000
The so-called Ice Barbie allegedly had her rumored bow, expired special media, expired special employee Corey Lewandowski, fire a Coast Guard pilot last May after a gnome neglected to bring her favorite weighted blanket onto the second flight of one of her trips.
00:06:40.000 --> 00:06:46.079
But three DHS insiders, and there we go, there's always leakers.
00:06:46.079 --> 00:06:53.120
And can I tell you, the Coast Guard now under DHS, a lot of leaks are coming out of the Coast Guard.
00:06:53.120 --> 00:07:07.279
And when there are leaks out of an organization or a business, I'm telling you this, and I know this in my job because I deal with it all the time, that speaks to a negative, seriously in crisis culture problem.
00:07:07.279 --> 00:07:09.600
So in this case, we have three of them.
00:07:09.600 --> 00:07:11.680
So they say DHS insiders.
00:07:11.680 --> 00:07:31.839
I'm gonna say most likely one, if not all, are from the Coast Guard because those people said that the spectacle was, and those three said those three leakers, those three moles said it wasn't about a blanket, but rather a mysterious bag with potentially embarrassing contents.
00:07:31.839 --> 00:07:36.560
So quoting one of the insiders, quote, this was never about a blanket.
00:07:36.560 --> 00:07:39.600
The blanket was a cover story for what really happened.
00:07:39.600 --> 00:07:43.199
The whole thing was really about the bag that was left.
00:07:43.199 --> 00:08:03.680
So the insiders were unable to shed light on what was inside the bag, but reports be but because of the reports that leaked out about how Corey Lewandowski acted around it, brings a lot of scrutiny to this whole interaction.
00:08:03.680 --> 00:08:10.079
A commanding officer for the Coast Guard, Keith Thomas, who was flying the plane, was fired.
00:08:10.079 --> 00:08:14.480
And Thomas was told to take a commercial flight home when they reached their destination.
00:08:14.480 --> 00:08:22.560
But moments later, Lewandowski had to backtrack on Thomas's terminated employment, though he didn't do anything wrong.
00:08:22.560 --> 00:08:24.879
He didn't do any admission of wrongdoing.
00:08:24.879 --> 00:08:32.240
But instead, they needed to tap the pilot to fly her around again because no one else was available to fly them home.
00:08:32.240 --> 00:08:35.440
And that was in the Wall Street Journal.
00:08:35.440 --> 00:08:41.200
So this affair is considered a very poorly kept secret.
00:08:41.200 --> 00:08:46.240
Now, of course, I'm paying attention to the story because of my connection to the Coast Guard.
00:08:46.240 --> 00:08:55.039
I know so many people in the Coast Guard, and I know so many people retired from the Coast Guard, and I know Coast Guard pilots in the Coast Guard.
00:08:55.039 --> 00:08:58.879
So this story is a very believable story.
00:08:58.879 --> 00:09:07.120
So when you have behaviors like this, it leaves contempt and it leaves anger and it leaves people wanting retribution.
00:09:07.120 --> 00:09:17.039
Because I happen to know, and I know this from my direct messages, there are a lot of people in the Coast Guard who do not like how the administration is treating the Coast Guard.
00:09:17.039 --> 00:09:24.639
And I'm not saying this, yes, there is some bias there, but my goodness, these are the people out there, they are saving lives, they're protecting our coast, they are doing so many things.
00:09:24.639 --> 00:09:30.799
So for a Corey Lewandowski to fire a pilot like that is absolutely ridiculous.
00:09:30.799 --> 00:09:38.240
By the time Noam walks into that hearing room yesterday, the committee already has a full picture of her.
00:09:38.240 --> 00:09:46.799
All the things that she's done at DHS, everything happening in Minneapolis, her making all these wild comments from different locations.
00:09:46.799 --> 00:09:53.840
If you've followed my social media posts, there was one about her making a comment in Texas about something that's happening in Minnesota.
00:09:53.840 --> 00:09:55.919
Remember, she was wearing that ridiculous hat.
00:09:55.919 --> 00:10:07.919
But this rumored affair with a man on the government payroll, the man firing a military officer without authority, a cover story about a blanket that insiders have now blown up, this mysterious bag.
00:10:07.919 --> 00:10:14.559
Trust has been eroding for weeks, months around Christy Gnome.
00:10:14.559 --> 00:10:25.360
But now when things get messy, that's when leadership, and let's call it in this case the administration, President Trump, they have to start looking for fall guys when things get bad.
00:10:25.360 --> 00:10:37.360
And there's no question here, at least in my mind, from what I'm seeing and just reports that I'm reading, and how they're starting to circle the wagons, that Christy Gnome is now the administration fall person.
00:10:37.360 --> 00:10:40.159
And the question about Corey Lewandowski was coming.
00:10:40.159 --> 00:10:42.240
It was only a matter of time.
00:10:42.240 --> 00:10:52.799
So there she is, the congressional hearing, cameras on, and committee members who have been throwing every single thing at her, and all these things are sticking to her.
00:10:52.799 --> 00:10:56.080
Now we have one congresswoman asking a question.
00:10:56.080 --> 00:10:58.000
It wasn't a complicated one.
00:10:58.000 --> 00:10:59.519
It wasn't a trick.
00:10:59.759 --> 00:11:10.960
So, Secretary Noam, at any time during your tenure as director of Department of Homeland Security, have you had sexual relations with Corey Lewandowski?
00:11:11.600 --> 00:11:15.840
The person asking the question was Congresswoman Sidney Kamlager Dove.
00:11:15.840 --> 00:11:20.559
She is a Congresswoman representing the state of California, a Democrat.
00:11:20.559 --> 00:11:24.559
Secretary Noam had two choices, yes or no.
00:11:24.559 --> 00:11:26.159
Here's what she said instead.
00:11:26.559 --> 00:11:26.799
Mr.
00:11:26.799 --> 00:11:32.320
Chairman, I am shocked that we're going down and peddling tabloid garbage in this committee today.
00:11:32.320 --> 00:11:38.399
Reclaiming ma'am, one thing that I would tell you is that he is a special government employee who works for the White House.
00:11:38.720 --> 00:11:43.519
She talked for four minutes without once saying yes or no.
00:11:43.519 --> 00:11:46.639
And the Congresswoman, to her credit, did not let it go.
00:11:47.039 --> 00:11:47.759
Federal government is a very good idea.
00:11:47.759 --> 00:11:52.480
It is okay for you to be no authority by the question.
00:11:53.039 --> 00:11:55.519
It is okay for you to have no authority by the question.
00:11:55.759 --> 00:11:56.399
Um making it.
00:11:56.399 --> 00:12:04.960
So what I would say is that the question is what we do at the Department of Home every single day without any hesitation.
00:12:05.279 --> 00:12:08.799
Every single day is to protect the a one-sentence denial ends this.
00:12:08.799 --> 00:12:09.440
Full stop.
00:12:09.440 --> 00:12:10.080
Three words.
00:12:10.080 --> 00:12:12.159
No, I haven't, story over.
00:12:12.159 --> 00:12:13.279
Or no.
00:12:13.279 --> 00:12:15.519
News cycle moves on.
00:12:15.840 --> 00:12:20.879
Someone is asked to make decisions you or any federal official is sleeping with their subordinate.
00:12:20.879 --> 00:12:21.919
That should be the easiest.
00:12:21.919 --> 00:12:24.159
You should be wanting to answer that question.
00:12:24.159 --> 00:12:27.279
Because it is not about your sensor that you have brought.
00:12:27.279 --> 00:12:28.480
It is about your judge.
00:12:28.480 --> 00:12:29.519
That kind of garbage is a problem.
00:12:29.759 --> 00:12:33.759
It's about reclaiming my time so that I can hear my own.
00:12:33.759 --> 00:12:38.320
Here's what the non-answer communicated, whether she intended it to or not.
00:12:38.320 --> 00:12:39.919
I heard the question.
00:12:39.919 --> 00:12:41.519
I understood the question.
00:12:41.519 --> 00:12:44.000
I chose not to answer it.
00:12:44.000 --> 00:12:49.120
That is the only information people take away from a dodge that's obvious.
00:12:49.120 --> 00:12:56.960
Not innocence, not offense, just the confirmation that there was something she didn't want to say.
00:12:56.960 --> 00:13:00.240
When I look at a crisis, I always start with the human driver.
00:13:00.240 --> 00:13:00.960
Always.
00:13:00.960 --> 00:13:07.440
The thing underneath the tactical mistake, because the decision to dodge that question didn't come from nowhere.
00:13:07.440 --> 00:13:10.080
It came from a very specific mindset.
00:13:10.080 --> 00:13:12.480
The driver here is contempt.
00:13:12.480 --> 00:13:20.000
Contempt is different from the other crisis drivers I talk about, like narcissism, that's self-obsession, fear is self-protection.
00:13:20.000 --> 00:13:21.759
Contempt is directional.
00:13:21.759 --> 00:13:22.799
It's about a target.
00:13:22.799 --> 00:13:25.519
It says, you don't deserve a straight answer.
00:13:25.519 --> 00:13:27.600
This question is beneath me.
00:13:27.600 --> 00:13:32.480
The fact that you're even asking tells me everything I need to know about you.
00:13:32.480 --> 00:13:34.799
Watch the tell and gnome's response.
00:13:34.799 --> 00:13:37.440
She didn't say, I prefer not to discuss that.
00:13:37.440 --> 00:13:39.600
She said tabloid garbage.
00:13:39.600 --> 00:13:41.360
She performed offense.
00:13:41.360 --> 00:13:46.559
She looked at that question and decided the right move was to make the ask small.
00:13:46.559 --> 00:13:49.039
That's not deflection, that's contempt.
00:13:49.039 --> 00:13:53.679
And contempt is the only crisis driver that makes you look worse the harder you push back.
00:13:53.679 --> 00:13:58.080
So every time she called it garbage, she answered the question she was trying to avoid.
00:13:58.080 --> 00:14:06.399
And here's the thing about contempt in a crisis: it feels powerful in the moment, standing up, pushing back, refusing to dignify the question.
00:14:06.399 --> 00:14:10.799
It feels like strength, but it reads as guilt.
00:14:10.799 --> 00:14:14.080
We've all been asked a question we didn't want to answer.
00:14:14.080 --> 00:14:18.240
But if you're listening to this podcast, I bet you answered honestly.
00:14:18.240 --> 00:14:22.320
And I bet you've dealt with people who refuse to answer it.
00:14:22.320 --> 00:14:24.480
They make the question the problem.
00:14:24.480 --> 00:14:26.320
They performed the offense.
00:14:26.320 --> 00:14:27.679
They redirected.
00:14:27.679 --> 00:14:34.320
They gave you a speech about something adjacent and hoped that you would forget what you originally asked.
00:14:34.320 --> 00:14:36.000
And you know that never works.
00:14:36.000 --> 00:14:36.960
Not once.
00:14:36.960 --> 00:14:43.200
Not in a congressional hearing, not in a kitchen conversation with someone who supposedly cares about you.
00:14:43.200 --> 00:14:47.120
Not in a performance review with a manager who already knows the answer.
00:14:47.120 --> 00:15:02.000
Think about the last time someone asked you something direct and uncomfortable and you can't think about the last time you asked someone directly something that was uncomfortable and they came back with, I can't believe you're asking me that question.
00:15:02.000 --> 00:15:03.600
How did that land with you?
00:15:03.600 --> 00:15:05.440
Did it end the conversation?
00:15:05.440 --> 00:15:07.279
Did it tell the person?
00:15:07.279 --> 00:15:10.879
Did it tell you exactly what you needed to know about that person?
00:15:10.879 --> 00:15:13.759
That type of speech doesn't protect a person.
00:15:13.759 --> 00:15:17.759
It confirms what someone else is already worried about.
00:15:17.759 --> 00:15:23.919
The hard thing, the thing that takes discipline is separating how you feel about a question from how you answer it.
00:15:23.919 --> 00:15:25.919
I tell this to clients all the time.
00:15:25.919 --> 00:15:27.519
I said it all week.
00:15:27.519 --> 00:15:33.440
I did five days of training in seven days, and I said this in every single one of my trainings.
00:15:33.440 --> 00:15:36.399
Noam clearly felt contempt for that question.
00:15:36.399 --> 00:15:40.399
Maybe it was genuine, maybe the question felt unfair to her.
00:15:40.399 --> 00:15:44.639
That feeling is allowed, but that feeling is not the response.
00:15:44.639 --> 00:15:46.320
The response is the response.
00:15:46.320 --> 00:15:52.399
And the response she chose made her look like someone with something to hide, whether she does or not.
00:15:52.399 --> 00:15:54.000
But I think she does.
00:15:54.000 --> 00:15:57.200
And the fix is so simple.
00:15:57.200 --> 00:15:58.720
She could have said this.
00:15:58.720 --> 00:16:00.000
No, I have not.
00:16:00.000 --> 00:16:00.960
Next question.
00:16:00.960 --> 00:16:02.559
It's done in 30 seconds.
00:16:02.559 --> 00:16:03.600
The story moves on.
00:16:03.600 --> 00:16:10.000
But instead, we have this clip and we have this podcast episode.
00:16:10.000 --> 00:16:14.480
So here's what I want you to think about this week.
00:16:14.480 --> 00:16:24.240
Is there a question that you've asked someone at work, at home, or in your head that they and they've been responding with a speech instead of an answer?
00:16:24.240 --> 00:16:29.919
That speech isn't protecting the person, it's just making your question louder.
00:16:29.919 --> 00:16:32.480
Pay attention to those conversations.
00:16:32.480 --> 00:16:34.720
Pay attention to the dodge.
00:16:34.720 --> 00:16:37.120
All right, that's it for this week's episode.
00:16:37.120 --> 00:16:38.879
Thanks so much for listening.
00:16:38.879 --> 00:16:42.480
If this resonated, please send it to someone who needs it.
00:16:42.480 --> 00:16:46.240
And please come back next week because we keep going.