Nov. 5, 2025

The Anatomy of a Royal Fallout: The PR Behind the Prince Andrew Statement

The Anatomy of a Royal Fallout: The PR Behind the Prince Andrew Statement

This episode goes behind the polished words of Buckingham Palace to unpack the public relations machinery that managed the downfall of Prince Andrew.

In October 2025, King Charles III formally removed all of Andrew’s titles and evicted him from his Windsor residence.
On the surface, it looked like accountability.
But beneath the royal phrasing lay a carefully timed communications plan.

We’ll walk through the anatomy of that plan: how one resurfaced email reignited the scandal, how two precisely timed statements reframed it,
 and how the Palace’s language turned a personal disgrace into an institutional act of duty.

Want More Behind the Breakdown?
Follow The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson on Substack for early access to podcast episodes, exclusive member chats, weekly lives, and monthly workshops that go deeper than the mic. It's the insider’s hub for communicators who want strategy with spine—and a little side-eye where it counts.

Follow Molly on Substack
Subscribe to Molly's Weekly Newsletter
Subscribe to Molly's Live Events Calendar.

Need a Keynote Speaker? Drawing from real-world PR battles, Molly delivers the same engaging stories and hard-won crisis insights from the podcast to your live audience. Click here to book Molly for your next meeting.

This podcast is supported by Muck Rack, the PR management platform I use to monitor media coverage, track journalist activity, and inform high-stakes strategy with real-time data. Click here to try Muck Rack for yourself.


Follow & Connect with Molly:

00:00 - Setting The Scandal Frame

01:19 - What The Palace Just Did

02:35 - The Trigger: That 2011 Email

04:58 - Rewatching Newsnight And Scoop

07:07 - Why The Interview Imploded

09:10 - The Timing Becomes The Story

10:59 - Books, Repetition, And Fergie Fallout

13:35 - Political Pressure And Inevitability

15:23 - Five Incidents That Stacked Up

18:01 - Soft Landing: Andrew’s Statement

21:28 - Hard Landing: Palace Enforcement

24:15 - Two‑Step Disassociation Strategy

26:27 - Historical Precedent And Lessons

29:03 - The Language Of Control

WEBVTT

00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:03.359
Let's talk about how some scandals end.

00:00:03.600 --> 00:00:05.759
Because they don't collapse overnight.

00:00:05.919 --> 00:00:08.640
They build slowly, deliberately.

00:00:08.800 --> 00:00:24.239
And then one day you wake up, or it's later in the afternoon on a Friday, and there's a palace statement that sounds compassionate on the surface, but underneath it's pure strategy or deflection.

00:00:24.480 --> 00:00:31.760
That's what just happened to Prince Andrew, or as he's now officially called, Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.

00:00:31.920 --> 00:00:39.280
Late last week, Buckingham Palace confirmed that King Charles had stripped Andrew of all royal titles, including Prince Andrew.

00:00:39.439 --> 00:00:45.439
His lease on Royal Lodge, the Windsor estate he had occupied for decades, was terminated.

00:00:45.679 --> 00:00:49.600
He was instructed to move to private accommodations.

00:00:50.000 --> 00:00:54.320
Effectively, it was a royal eviction.

00:00:54.640 --> 00:01:02.479
The palace calls it necessary, and they said it was done with the utmost sympathy for a certain group of people.

00:01:02.640 --> 00:01:11.680
Let's talk about that group, why it matters, and get to the real story, the one underneath those polished statements and about how we got here.

00:01:11.920 --> 00:01:19.200
And when you line up the events, you see something that always appears in these types of crises: a pattern.

00:01:19.359 --> 00:01:22.000
It's not random, it's a system.

00:01:22.319 --> 00:01:29.599
Let's review a royal scandal that unfolded in three phases: the trigger, the timing, then the words.

00:01:29.760 --> 00:01:33.120
Let's go through each piece by piece.

00:01:33.439 --> 00:01:35.840
Hey there, welcome to the PR Breakdown Podcast.

00:01:35.920 --> 00:01:40.799
I'm your host, Molly McPherson, and this week it's all about Prince Andrew.

00:01:40.959 --> 00:01:47.040
I know if you're on social media, if you're reading news accounts, there are so many articles about this.

00:01:47.280 --> 00:01:57.680
But I want to focus on one area that I don't see much content about, and that is looking at the statements themselves, backed up by the events that happened.

00:01:57.840 --> 00:02:01.040
Because scandals are rarely about a single moment.

00:02:01.200 --> 00:02:09.280
They're about accumulation, a slow build of stories and documents and outrage until silence becomes impossible.

00:02:09.520 --> 00:02:13.039
And for Prince Andrew, that trigger wasn't new.

00:02:13.199 --> 00:02:13.919
It was old.

00:02:14.080 --> 00:02:16.240
It's been lurking for a long time.

00:02:16.400 --> 00:02:20.159
And one of the things that brought him down was an email.

00:02:20.319 --> 00:02:23.039
That email that wouldn't go away.

00:02:23.280 --> 00:02:27.759
In January of this year, an old email resurfaced in the press.

00:02:27.919 --> 00:02:35.039
And it's the one showing that Andrew had stayed in contact with Jeffrey Epstein after the period he claimed their friend up ended.

00:02:35.199 --> 00:02:43.360
Now, in the 2019 BBC Newsnight interview with Emily Maitless, I watched it again on Friday afternoon.

00:02:43.520 --> 00:02:45.439
I took a quick lunch break.

00:02:45.599 --> 00:02:54.560
And next thing you know, on my lunch break, I am watching the entire program on Netflix called Scoop about the interview.

00:02:54.800 --> 00:02:58.879
It sucked a major portion out of my day, but I got sucked into it.

00:02:59.039 --> 00:03:24.319
And then after work that day, throughout the night and then into the weekend, I watched that interview, the actual interview over again because it is fascinating to see what happened and where, not necessarily where it all started, but the sheer arrogance that Prince Andrew thought that he could outrun or outsmart this crisis from that interview.

00:03:24.560 --> 00:03:32.240
I highly encourage you to watch that interview, but I'll be sure to add a few clips in here just in case you don't get around to it.

00:03:32.400 --> 00:03:41.759
But that is the interview where he claimed because of his time with the Royal Navy he could no longer sweat.

00:03:41.919 --> 00:03:48.400
It was also the interview where he said very specifically that he was at a Pizza Express.

00:03:48.639 --> 00:03:51.360
Just for a second, listen to Emily Maitless.

00:03:51.599 --> 00:03:53.439
Why would you remember that so specifically?

00:03:53.599 --> 00:03:56.639
Why would you remember a Pizza Express birthday and being at home?

00:03:56.960 --> 00:04:01.919
Because going to Pizza Express in Woking is an unusual thing for me to do.

00:04:02.159 --> 00:04:03.680
A very unusual thing for me to do.

00:04:03.840 --> 00:04:09.199
I've only been through Woking a couple of times, um, and I remember it weirdly distinctly.

00:04:09.599 --> 00:04:12.560
But as soon as somebody reminded me of it, I went, Oh yes, I remember that.

00:04:12.800 --> 00:04:20.319
But I have no recollection of ever meeting or being in the company or the presence.

00:04:20.639 --> 00:04:28.319
So all those sharp details that Angela remembered, yet he was forgetting so many things about Epstein.

00:04:28.480 --> 00:04:30.319
He always had this look on his face, like, what?

00:04:30.560 --> 00:04:31.759
I don't know what you're talking about.

00:04:31.839 --> 00:04:32.879
I don't know what you mean.

00:04:33.040 --> 00:04:39.360
But then when he had to remember those specifics to get around the lie, you've all been there, right?

00:04:39.439 --> 00:04:41.680
You know someone who's lying to your face.

00:04:41.839 --> 00:04:42.800
That's what they do.

00:04:43.040 --> 00:04:46.639
They always just double down on the details.

00:04:46.879 --> 00:04:52.639
Andrew had insisted that he had only seen Epstein once after his conviction and had cut ties in 2010.

00:04:52.720 --> 00:04:57.040
But that email, dated February 2011, told a different story.

00:04:57.279 --> 00:05:03.600
Prince Andrew wrote to Epstein, thanking him for their last meeting and saying, quote, let's play some more soon.

00:05:03.839 --> 00:05:06.959
That phrase that became tabloid dynamite.

00:05:07.120 --> 00:05:12.079
It suggested ongoing familiarity long after the supposed break.

00:05:12.240 --> 00:05:18.480
And honestly, no one who has even a surface knowledge of Prince Andrew should be surprised.

00:05:18.639 --> 00:05:25.040
It was included in a set of financial conduct authority court documents and had technically been public since early this year.

00:05:25.199 --> 00:05:29.519
But in October, British papers splashed it across their front pages.

00:05:29.839 --> 00:05:30.480
Why?

00:05:30.720 --> 00:05:33.680
Because now it landed in a different context.

00:05:33.920 --> 00:05:41.040
One of the most important parts of a crisis that a lot of people forget to look for, and that is the timing.

00:05:41.360 --> 00:05:51.279
The timing coincided with a wave of other unflattering headlines, all reinforcing the same story that Andrew's version of events couldn't be trusted.

00:05:51.519 --> 00:05:54.160
Now I just mentioned the newsnight interview.

00:05:54.399 --> 00:05:59.360
Let's go back to that newsnight interview because it's the bedrock of this entire crisis.

00:05:59.519 --> 00:06:07.839
So back in November 2019, the Duke of York sat down with BBC journalist Emily Maitless to quote set the record straight.

00:06:08.079 --> 00:06:10.160
The goal was damage control.

00:06:10.319 --> 00:06:15.279
If you watch Scoop on Netflix, you know everything that was happening behind the scenes.

00:06:15.519 --> 00:06:19.360
The result, however, was reputation collapse.

00:06:19.759 --> 00:06:32.399
In the interview, Andrew denied ever meeting Virginia Duffre, denied any sexual contact, saying he was home with his children after visiting, very specifically, Pizza Express.

00:06:32.560 --> 00:06:41.360
Claimed a medical condition, prevented him from sweating, contradicting Jufre's description, and said staying with Epstein after his conviction was wrong.

00:06:41.600 --> 00:06:43.680
The interview was supposed to humanize him.

00:06:43.920 --> 00:06:47.199
Instead, it made him look delusional.

00:06:47.360 --> 00:06:55.839
Like honestly, he thought that he was going to convince Maitless, the UK, the rest of the world, everyone paying attention.

00:06:56.000 --> 00:06:58.879
Such a delusional, egocentric thought.

00:06:59.040 --> 00:07:02.079
But within 48 hours, his public duties were suspended.

00:07:02.240 --> 00:07:06.079
Within a week, sponsors and charities had cut ties with Prince Andrew.

00:07:06.160 --> 00:07:10.399
And by early 2020, the monarchy had quietly exiled him from public life.

00:07:10.560 --> 00:07:17.040
So when that 2011 email reappeared showing continued contact, it just wasn't another headline.

00:07:17.199 --> 00:07:20.639
It directly undercut his only public defense.

00:07:20.879 --> 00:07:23.199
Then came the literary wave.

00:07:23.360 --> 00:07:32.399
In 2025, royal biographer Andrew Louney published entitled The Rise and Fall of Prince Andrew, a deeply researched but scathing portrayal.

00:07:32.560 --> 00:07:45.439
It chronicled Prince Andrew's years of arrogance and questionable business deals and his behavior that was so off-kilter, planting him as a man shaped by privilege and detached from accountability.

00:07:45.680 --> 00:07:48.319
That along with his wife, Fergie, as well.

00:07:48.480 --> 00:07:52.959
Shortly after, Virginia Dufrey's posthumous memoir hit shells.

00:07:53.120 --> 00:08:02.879
The book revisits her experiences with Epstein and detailed Prince Andrew's alleged involvement, bringing the accusations back into the mainstream conversation.

00:08:03.040 --> 00:08:07.199
And a conversation, by the way, that is still swirling around President Trump.

00:08:07.360 --> 00:08:10.560
Both of these books were widely covered, reviewed, dissected.

00:08:10.720 --> 00:08:17.199
The effect wasn't new information necessarily, but it was the repetition of information.

00:08:17.439 --> 00:08:22.959
They made sure his name stayed active in the cycle of Epstein-related coverage.

00:08:23.199 --> 00:08:27.839
Even his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, Fergie got pulled back into the storm.

00:08:28.000 --> 00:08:37.360
Old correspondents surfaced showing she had privately maintained contact with Epstein as well, even after his conviction, thanking him for financial helps with debts.

00:08:37.519 --> 00:08:43.919
When that became public again in 2025, several of her charitable affiliations distanced themselves from Fergie.

00:08:44.000 --> 00:08:52.639
And that in turn reignited discussion of the couple's shared judgment or lack of it, even though they've been divorced since 1996.

00:08:52.960 --> 00:08:56.960
So by October of this year, the narrative had metastasized.

00:08:57.039 --> 00:09:00.080
It wasn't about a single act or even a single person.

00:09:00.240 --> 00:09:05.200
It was about the royal brand tolerating proximity to a predator.

00:09:05.440 --> 00:09:08.720
Now, across the Atlantic, on these shores, U.S.

00:09:08.799 --> 00:09:13.039
lawmakers have been demanding full disclosure of the Epstein documents.

00:09:13.200 --> 00:09:15.600
Thousands of pages of SEAL court filings.

00:09:15.759 --> 00:09:23.440
There are so many credible reports that Andrew's name appeared in flight manifests and guest lists for Epstein's private island and New York townhouse.

00:09:23.600 --> 00:09:28.879
British outlets began asking, would the monarchy survive another Epstein release?

00:09:29.039 --> 00:09:31.840
And at that point, the palace wasn't dealing with the rumor.

00:09:32.000 --> 00:09:34.159
They were dealing with an inevitability.

00:09:34.320 --> 00:09:37.519
This was a storm that wasn't going to go away.

00:09:37.679 --> 00:09:45.440
As one Royal Insider told The Times off record, quote, there comes a point when silence becomes complicity.

00:09:45.679 --> 00:09:51.759
And that's when the PR machine from the royal family from Buckingham Palace switched on.

00:09:51.919 --> 00:09:59.279
Now let's talk about the five incidents that finally stacked up to trigger this renewed crisis.

00:09:59.440 --> 00:10:02.720
So one, the email contradiction, that's proof that he lied.

00:10:02.960 --> 00:10:07.360
Two, it directly conflicted with something that he said on the Newsnight interview.

00:10:07.440 --> 00:10:09.360
That's a credibility disaster.

00:10:09.600 --> 00:10:14.080
Three, the books, it's the sustained narrative damage.

00:10:14.480 --> 00:10:16.639
Four, the Fergie connection.

00:10:16.720 --> 00:10:18.399
It's just the collateral op.

00:10:18.720 --> 00:10:23.039
Everything those two touch or any of their dealings are tainted.

00:10:23.200 --> 00:10:29.519
And five, the Epstein document push, the political urgency on both sides of the Atlantic.

00:10:29.759 --> 00:10:35.039
Individually, one by one, survivable, but together they're catastrophic.

00:10:35.200 --> 00:10:42.879
That's the incident that creates the trigger that turns private embarrassment into an institutional crisis.

00:10:43.039 --> 00:10:49.120
And once the monarchy felt that heat, the next phase kicked in, and that's the timing.

00:10:49.279 --> 00:10:54.799
So often PR is about emotion, but when it comes to the royal family, it's not.

00:10:54.960 --> 00:10:56.399
It's about the sequencing.

00:10:56.559 --> 00:11:01.039
So when the pressure hits its peak, the palace doesn't react instinctively.

00:11:01.200 --> 00:11:18.559
If you think back to all the royal crises that have happened, Harry and Meghan, Princess Catherine, Kate Middleton with her cancer diagnosis, the hiding of it, the covering of it, and then the eventual reveal calibrates the royal family, Buckingham Palace.

00:11:18.639 --> 00:11:20.480
They calibrate the moment to act.

00:11:20.639 --> 00:11:29.120
It's precisely the moment where they feel that doing so seems morally inevitable, but politically controlled.

00:11:29.200 --> 00:11:30.399
And that's what happened here.

00:11:30.559 --> 00:11:33.039
We have no idea knowing what's going on behind the scenes.

00:11:33.200 --> 00:11:39.600
People assume because it's the royal family that everything is proper, everything is right, everything is a board.

00:11:39.679 --> 00:11:56.559
But if you watch any of the accounts of the royal family, if you watch The Crown on Netflix, if you watch Scoop, if you read, if you follow news accounts, now we nobody really knows exactly what goes on behind the royal walls and behind closed doors.

00:11:56.879 --> 00:12:03.200
But collectively, when these things start to accumulate, you can see the patterns there and see how they operate.

00:12:03.440 --> 00:12:06.879
And certainly there was a structure to what happened here.

00:12:07.039 --> 00:12:09.600
Now, the first step was the soft landing.

00:12:09.840 --> 00:12:15.440
That happened a couple weeks ago on 17 October when Andrew released his own statement.

00:12:15.600 --> 00:12:17.279
I did a post on social media.

00:12:17.360 --> 00:12:19.759
I'll include a link in the show notes.

00:12:19.840 --> 00:12:22.000
It happened on a Friday, early afternoon.

00:12:22.080 --> 00:12:25.759
So that meant it was released late Friday, UK time.

00:12:25.840 --> 00:12:28.080
And I remember just hopping online real quick.

00:12:28.240 --> 00:12:39.120
I started filming before I even read the statement because I knew even in the first read, I would be able to glean what was happening there just from how the statement was written.

00:12:39.200 --> 00:12:45.279
And because it was from Prince Andrew, I could assume right off the bat, there wasn't going to be accountability.

00:12:45.440 --> 00:12:46.960
It was going to be deflection.

00:12:47.120 --> 00:12:50.960
There was going to be ego embedded in the words of the statement.

00:12:51.120 --> 00:12:52.639
And the statement delivered.

00:12:52.799 --> 00:13:02.240
This is what he wrote: quote, in discussion with the king and my immediate and wider family, we have concluded the continued accusations about me distracting from the work of his majesty and the royal family.

00:13:02.559 --> 00:13:08.159
I have decided, as I always have, to put my duty to my family and country first.

00:13:08.320 --> 00:13:11.919
With his majesty's agreement, we feel I must now go a step further.

00:13:12.080 --> 00:13:16.240
I will therefore no longer use my title or the honors which have been conferred upon me.

00:13:16.399 --> 00:13:21.840
But he also reiterates, I vigorously deny the accusations against me.

00:13:22.080 --> 00:13:25.279
It reads like a voluntary resignation.

00:13:25.440 --> 00:13:40.080
In those words, with his majesty's agreement, in other words, this is Prince Andrew deciding on his own that he is going to go a step further and decide to no longer use his title or honors which have been conferred upon me.

00:13:40.240 --> 00:13:45.679
It's more like a gesture where he's saying, I'm doing this for the good of the family.

00:13:45.919 --> 00:13:54.399
But make no mistake, that is stage one of the palace playbook because there's no way that Prince Andrew, we don't even need to know him.

00:13:54.559 --> 00:13:58.559
Hey, by the way, I actually did I meet Prince Andrew?

00:13:58.960 --> 00:14:00.000
I can't remember.

00:14:00.240 --> 00:14:01.279
Years ago.

00:14:01.440 --> 00:14:04.799
So this would have been 1998, I think.

00:14:05.120 --> 00:14:11.279
Prince Andrew, I was at a dinner reception with Prince Andrew on the Constitution in Boston.

00:14:11.519 --> 00:14:15.440
So at the time, this was my former husband, military.

00:14:15.519 --> 00:14:16.960
There was some military event.

00:14:17.120 --> 00:14:18.320
And he was on the boat.

00:14:18.480 --> 00:14:23.039
No, I didn't meet him, but I saw him because I thought if I met him, then I would have been curtsying.

00:14:23.279 --> 00:14:24.559
And honestly, why would he meet me?

00:14:24.639 --> 00:14:25.200
I was on a date.

00:14:25.279 --> 00:14:26.399
I wasn't even a military spouse.

00:14:26.480 --> 00:14:27.679
I was just on a date at that point.

00:14:27.759 --> 00:14:29.679
And I was probably had a few cocktails of me.

00:14:29.759 --> 00:14:31.679
But I definitely saw Prince Andrew.

00:14:31.759 --> 00:14:36.080
And now that we hear all this stuff about Prince Andrew, I wonder what he was doing in Boston.

00:14:36.240 --> 00:14:39.360
Who knows what was going on in Boston when he was visiting?

00:14:39.679 --> 00:14:41.919
But he's just not someone.

00:14:42.240 --> 00:14:50.399
Because I remember watching him and knowing at that time, back in the late 90s, he was still known as the Randy Andy.

00:14:50.559 --> 00:14:52.399
Was he divorced from Friggy at that point?

00:14:52.559 --> 00:14:53.200
I believe so.

00:14:53.360 --> 00:14:59.519
When I saw him, gosh, now come to think of it, I'm thinking as I'm recording this, I wonder if Diana was alive.

00:14:59.679 --> 00:15:02.080
Because I feel like Diana would have been alive.

00:15:02.240 --> 00:15:03.600
It was right around the time.

00:15:03.759 --> 00:15:04.240
You know what?

00:15:04.399 --> 00:15:08.879
I bet I saw him right before Princess Diana died, as a matter of fact.

00:15:09.039 --> 00:15:14.159
Because I think I would have been paying attention far more to Prince Andrew, knowing that Princess Diana died.

00:15:14.240 --> 00:15:14.639
I'm sorry.

00:15:14.720 --> 00:15:16.720
Thank you for going along with me on this whole thing.

00:15:16.879 --> 00:15:21.440
It was definitely before Princess Diana died when he was on that boat in Boston.

00:15:21.600 --> 00:15:27.600
But anyway, the point is he was always known as carried himself in this rather arrogant way.

00:15:27.679 --> 00:15:31.039
And I just remember the buzz around him that time that he was definitely that way.

00:15:31.279 --> 00:15:34.799
Now, two weeks later, after his statement, comes the hard landing.

00:15:34.879 --> 00:15:39.679
And that came out just a few days ago from this recording on 30 October.

00:15:39.840 --> 00:15:44.000
So just 13 days later, the king issued a formal statement.

00:15:44.080 --> 00:15:46.559
Well, technically it was through Buckingham Palace.

00:15:46.720 --> 00:15:53.919
The statement said, quote, His Majesty has today initiated a formal process to remove the styled titles and honors of Prince Andrew.

00:15:54.080 --> 00:15:57.120
Prince Andrew will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.

00:15:57.279 --> 00:16:02.080
His lease and royal lodge has today provided him with legal protection to continue in residence.

00:16:02.240 --> 00:16:07.679
Formal notice has now been served to surrender the lease, and he will move to alternative private accommodation.

00:16:07.840 --> 00:16:13.600
These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him.

00:16:13.759 --> 00:16:23.279
Their Majesty's wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been and will remain with the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse.

00:16:23.759 --> 00:16:25.200
That was not a suggestion.

00:16:25.360 --> 00:16:27.039
It was an execution order.

00:16:27.279 --> 00:16:30.159
Cloaked in royal courtesy.

00:16:30.320 --> 00:16:35.759
Within hours, the BBC, Guardian, Times, and AP all published the full text verbatim.

00:16:35.919 --> 00:16:41.200
So that uniformity alone tells you the palace had pre-cleared distribution.

00:16:41.360 --> 00:16:50.480
Now, if you look at all the other content out there and the royal content on social media, so many other theories as to who really chimed in on the statement.

00:16:50.720 --> 00:16:54.879
Was it Prince William who was pressuring the king to do this?

00:16:55.120 --> 00:17:06.960
People magazine assumed just from the language, you know, discussing the victims of abuse that Queen Camilla and Princess Catherine, Kate Middleton, that they had something to do with it.

00:17:07.119 --> 00:17:07.519
I don't know.

00:17:07.599 --> 00:17:09.680
I don't think it's quite as loosey-goosey.

00:17:09.839 --> 00:17:15.839
I think this was definitely driven by the king in support of everyone else.

00:17:16.079 --> 00:17:20.240
Now, removing the title Prince is unprecedented in modern royal history.

00:17:20.319 --> 00:17:30.000
It effectively erases his identity as a working royal, slightly different than Harry and Megan, where they made the choices to leave.

00:17:30.079 --> 00:17:35.359
So that's why their situation is much different than what's happening to Andrew.

00:17:35.519 --> 00:17:46.799
And the change from Andrew Maubat in Windsor, that's his legal surname, symbolizes a total reclassification from member of the firm to just a regular private citizen.

00:17:46.960 --> 00:17:51.039
So evicting him from the Royal Lodge just seals that transformation.

00:17:51.200 --> 00:18:05.920
So that property had been under long-term lease, which, according to reports, Andrew did, I think I saw that he contributed$8 million towards renovations of that lodge, but really wasn't paying much of anything to live there.

00:18:06.079 --> 00:18:12.720
But living there gave Andrew certain legal protections, preventing the removal from that location.

00:18:12.880 --> 00:18:19.119
But by serving formal notice, the palace signaled it was willing to override those protections under royal prerogative.

00:18:19.359 --> 00:18:22.559
So in PR terms, that's substance.

00:18:22.720 --> 00:18:25.759
It's not just optics anymore, it's action.

00:18:26.000 --> 00:18:34.319
October 17th and October 30th announcements form what crisis managers like myself might call a two-step disassociation strategy.

00:18:34.559 --> 00:18:40.000
Step one is the voluntary withdrawal that lets the subject appear to act out of conscience.

00:18:40.079 --> 00:18:43.599
It reduces sympathy, backlash, preserves dignity.

00:18:43.759 --> 00:18:46.720
And then step two, it's the institutional enforcement.

00:18:46.880 --> 00:18:54.960
It follows up with formal action that cements the decision, framed as necessary rather than punitive.

00:18:55.200 --> 00:19:05.039
Perhaps they allowed Andrew his ego in that first statement, but they knew that the hammer was coming down in the second one.

00:19:05.200 --> 00:19:07.599
It's the strategy of emotional sequencing.

00:19:07.759 --> 00:19:11.599
People don't revolt against a process that feels inevitable.

00:19:11.759 --> 00:19:13.599
It's just easier to accept it that way.

00:19:13.759 --> 00:19:16.000
And that's why those 13 days matter.

00:19:16.160 --> 00:19:18.559
They weren't about hesitation.

00:19:18.799 --> 00:19:21.920
It was about conditioning public sentiment.

00:19:22.079 --> 00:19:24.640
At least that's my impression of it.

00:19:24.799 --> 00:19:28.880
I don't think that we had a random Andrew statement.

00:19:28.960 --> 00:19:32.880
And then two weeks later, the palace decides that they have to go now.

00:19:33.119 --> 00:19:34.720
I think there was a lot of pressure there.

00:19:34.880 --> 00:19:40.319
It could have been a month later, but it was a part of a two-step strategy.

00:19:40.880 --> 00:19:43.119
And there is some precedent here.

00:19:43.279 --> 00:19:49.359
The palace has used similar pacing during the abdication of Edward VIII in 1936.

00:19:49.680 --> 00:19:55.920
It allowed him to announce his voluntary choice before formally removing his royal standing.

00:19:56.000 --> 00:20:02.400
You remember when he chose to be with his wife, Wallace, a divorce from the U.S.

00:20:02.559 --> 00:20:04.319
I believe she was from Baltimore.

00:20:04.400 --> 00:20:15.680
And they did it again after Princess Diana's 1995 panorama interview, where she basically came out and made all of those statements about her marriage.

00:20:16.000 --> 00:20:18.400
Very shocking interview.

00:20:18.720 --> 00:20:21.599
But statements were there to manage tone.

00:20:21.680 --> 00:20:24.880
And it's not just about substance, it's how they're moving forward.

00:20:25.039 --> 00:20:31.599
And with Princess Diana, I think is where the royal family really learned about public opinion and how little they had.

00:20:31.759 --> 00:20:44.400
And King Charles, no doubt, remembers the time when he was Prince Charles with Princess Diana, how he lost the power of public opinion compared to his former wife.

00:20:44.559 --> 00:20:47.519
It feels as if he's learning those lessons.

00:20:47.680 --> 00:20:51.839
And that's why the choreography of control is so important now.

00:20:52.079 --> 00:20:53.440
The planning is better.

00:20:53.599 --> 00:20:56.319
One message softens, the next one seals.

00:20:56.480 --> 00:20:58.160
That's what happened to Andrew.

00:20:58.240 --> 00:21:00.880
It's that soft surrender, hard closure.

00:21:01.039 --> 00:21:05.119
Anything we see in the future, I think we're going to see it in this type of a pattern.

00:21:05.359 --> 00:21:09.359
They also learned their lesson with Princess Catherine's cancer diagnosis.

00:21:09.440 --> 00:21:11.359
They got caught flat footed on that.

00:21:11.519 --> 00:21:12.799
They tried to hide it.

00:21:12.960 --> 00:21:17.680
They tried to outsmart the press and the public, and they lost badly.

00:21:17.839 --> 00:21:22.880
And now it seems like they've really figured out how to control the messaging.

00:21:23.039 --> 00:21:27.839
Now let's look at the part that I didn't see a lot of content focus on, and that's the language.

00:21:28.079 --> 00:21:34.559
Because the palace doesn't speak like a celebrity or a family, it speaks like an institution.

00:21:34.799 --> 00:21:42.880
Every phrase in that October 30th statement from Buckingham Palace was engineered to balance compassion with control.

00:21:43.279 --> 00:21:47.839
In the opening, quote, His Majesty has today initiated a formal process.

00:21:48.079 --> 00:21:50.720
That phrase signals hierarchy.

00:21:50.880 --> 00:21:55.599
It positions the king not as a brother, but as the sovereign.

00:21:55.759 --> 00:21:59.920
The action isn't emotional, it's more administrative.

00:22:00.160 --> 00:22:04.079
The subtext is this is a constitutional necessity.

00:22:04.240 --> 00:22:05.920
This is not a family punishment.

00:22:06.160 --> 00:22:15.039
It also reminds the audience that the king acts as protector of the institution, not protector of his brother.

00:22:15.279 --> 00:22:18.960
This line, quote, These censures are deemed necessary.

00:22:19.519 --> 00:22:21.920
This is bureaucratic detachment.

00:22:22.079 --> 00:22:24.640
It doesn't say we have decided.

00:22:24.799 --> 00:22:27.359
It says they are deemed.

00:22:27.599 --> 00:22:34.640
Passive voice removes ownership, making the act sound inevitable, as if duty itself required it.

00:22:34.720 --> 00:22:39.680
And that word necessary frames it as reluctant but unavoidable.

00:22:39.839 --> 00:22:43.440
It's the language of moral authority without emotional involvement.

00:22:43.599 --> 00:22:50.799
This line, quote, Their Majesty's wish to make clear their sympathies remain with victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse.

00:22:51.039 --> 00:22:55.839
That's institutional empathy and something you do not often hear coming out of Buckingham Palace.

00:22:56.000 --> 00:23:02.319
And notice how it's phrased: not the victims in this case, but victims of any and all forms of abuse.

00:23:02.480 --> 00:23:05.680
It expands the sentiment beyond the specific scandal.

00:23:05.839 --> 00:23:10.960
It's a classic PR maneuver to avoid liability when signaling compassion.

00:23:11.200 --> 00:23:17.759
So in essence, the royal family, Buckingham Palace, are saying we care about the issue, but we're not admitting association.

00:23:17.920 --> 00:23:22.079
They didn't focus on just the victims of Epstein.

00:23:22.160 --> 00:23:23.599
It's all victims.

00:23:23.839 --> 00:23:27.759
Next, quote, will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.

00:23:28.000 --> 00:23:30.240
This line does more than identify.

00:23:30.400 --> 00:23:39.440
It rebrands, it shifts public framing from Prince Andrew, his royal identity, to Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, a brand new private citizen.

00:23:39.599 --> 00:23:43.279
It's the verbal equivalent of removing a logo from a product line.

00:23:43.519 --> 00:23:46.240
Same person, but way different category.

00:23:46.400 --> 00:23:55.759
So when media outlets begin adopting the new name within hours, if you read the BBC or any article in The Guardian, it showed the coordination.

00:23:55.920 --> 00:23:57.599
That's not media guessing.

00:23:57.680 --> 00:24:00.559
That's the media following the palace guidance.

00:24:00.720 --> 00:24:03.119
The Wikipedia page wasn't updated yet.

00:24:03.279 --> 00:24:05.920
The royal website was not updated.

00:24:06.240 --> 00:24:08.640
But media accounts, they were.

00:24:08.880 --> 00:24:12.880
This line, a consistent one, quote, he continues to deny the allegations.

00:24:13.039 --> 00:24:17.039
This line is important because it protects the palace from appearing to confirm guilt.

00:24:17.200 --> 00:24:22.799
By explicitly stating that Andrew continues to deny, the monarchy avoids making a moral judgment.

00:24:22.960 --> 00:24:26.799
It distances the act, removing titles from underlying claims.

00:24:26.960 --> 00:24:30.720
So they can say, we acted out of duty, not because he's guilty.

00:24:30.880 --> 00:24:34.720
That phrasing protects both the integrity and the public optics.

00:24:34.960 --> 00:24:44.319
So in all the statements since 2022 involving this PR crisis, there is a linguistic rhythm.

00:24:44.400 --> 00:24:45.759
There's a formality.

00:24:46.000 --> 00:24:47.920
His majesty is today initiated.

00:24:48.000 --> 00:24:49.279
There's a detachment.

00:24:49.440 --> 00:24:51.359
These censures are deemed necessary.

00:24:51.440 --> 00:24:52.960
There's an empathy buffer.

00:24:53.119 --> 00:24:54.880
Sympathies remain with victims.

00:24:55.119 --> 00:24:56.559
There's a neutralization.

00:24:56.720 --> 00:24:58.319
He continues to deny.

00:24:58.480 --> 00:25:03.920
There's an identity reset, will now be known as that's not coincidence.

00:25:04.079 --> 00:25:06.720
It's now the new royal communication template.

00:25:06.880 --> 00:25:14.079
It's designed to sound honorable, not emotional, because in monarchy PR, emotion implies instability.

00:25:14.400 --> 00:25:16.480
Formality implies control.

00:25:16.960 --> 00:25:28.240
So if we were to put this all together, the fall of Prince Andrew was spontaneous from Andrew's point of view, but systematic when it comes from the palace.

00:25:28.480 --> 00:25:35.039
It was a managed descent structured around three principles: the trigger, the timing, the words, the trigger.

00:25:35.200 --> 00:25:46.000
It was the accumulation of scandal, the email, the newsnight contradictions, the books, the memoir, the Fergie fallout, and the pressure from the Epstein documents.

00:25:46.160 --> 00:25:51.359
It creates this moral momentum that the palace could no longer ignore.

00:25:51.519 --> 00:25:54.319
Then the timing had that two-step rollout.

00:25:54.559 --> 00:25:59.839
Voluntary withdrawal on 17 October, then formal removal on 30 October.

00:26:00.000 --> 00:26:08.480
It was deliberate and it gave the illusion of choice before the enforcement, but it was definitely the enforcement and the words.

00:26:08.640 --> 00:26:12.319
The final statement turned condemnation into formality.

00:26:12.400 --> 00:26:16.160
It was controlled, it was careful, and it was choreographed.

00:26:16.319 --> 00:26:21.039
So by the time the announcement hit the wires, public outrage had already peaked.

00:26:21.200 --> 00:26:24.319
And the palace didn't chase the narrative.

00:26:24.480 --> 00:26:26.640
It waited for it in the timing.

00:26:26.799 --> 00:26:28.160
There was a lot of pressure.

00:26:28.319 --> 00:26:32.720
There was going to be political pressure to move this along with Andrew.

00:26:32.799 --> 00:26:36.880
They were going to find more legal ways to make this move, more political ways to make this move.

00:26:37.039 --> 00:26:43.440
That's why the palace had to step up and then moved in a way that it felt inevitable and not impulsive.

00:26:43.599 --> 00:26:47.039
And that's now the new royal PR playbook.

00:26:47.119 --> 00:26:51.440
It's not about crisis response, it's about reputation choreography.

00:26:51.599 --> 00:26:57.519
And I think this signals the era of Prince William, eventually King William.

00:26:57.680 --> 00:26:59.839
It's going to be more choreographed.

00:27:00.000 --> 00:27:13.119
So next time you hear a royal statement that sounds oddly gentle, incredibly formal, yet impossibly final, remember behind every word, there's a team calculating tone, timing, and impact.

00:27:13.359 --> 00:27:16.960
Because in the monarchy, survival isn't just about bloodline.

00:27:17.200 --> 00:27:19.440
It's about brand discipline.

00:27:19.680 --> 00:27:22.880
And if I were Harry and Megan, oh my goodness.

00:27:23.119 --> 00:27:26.799
Now you can't even begin to compare them with a Prince Andrew.

00:27:26.960 --> 00:27:28.160
You can't even begin.

00:27:28.480 --> 00:27:33.759
But they are a PR thorn in the side of Buckingham Palace of the royal family.

00:27:34.079 --> 00:27:38.720
This hard drop of Prince Andrew, I bet is rattling Harry.

00:27:38.880 --> 00:27:42.720
Megan and Harry showing all this enthusiasm about the Dodgers.

00:27:42.880 --> 00:27:44.400
Megan's from Los Angeles.

00:27:44.640 --> 00:27:46.160
Okay, we're with you there.

00:27:46.400 --> 00:27:47.759
You can be bandwagon.

00:27:47.839 --> 00:27:48.240
That's fine.

00:27:48.319 --> 00:27:51.359
We have no idea that you like sports at all, much less baseball.

00:27:51.440 --> 00:27:53.440
But the Dodgers are in the World Series again.

00:27:53.519 --> 00:27:56.720
I don't remember a lot of press the last time the Dodgers won the World Series.

00:27:56.880 --> 00:27:58.240
But okay, I get it.

00:27:58.400 --> 00:28:00.000
But then you're bringing Harry.

00:28:00.160 --> 00:28:02.319
And baseball is not UK.

00:28:02.400 --> 00:28:06.319
They play NFL, plays over there, but baseball is American.

00:28:06.400 --> 00:28:08.480
That is Apple Pie American.

00:28:08.559 --> 00:28:09.680
That is not UK.

00:28:09.839 --> 00:28:12.480
So to bring Harry in there and to go to the game.

00:28:12.640 --> 00:28:20.000
And also they said that I saw a clip that said that they had 12 bodyguards or 11 bodyguards bringing them into Dodger Stadium.

00:28:20.079 --> 00:28:24.480
And then I saw another post where Megan is cheering because they're watching it and Harry's just in there.

00:28:24.640 --> 00:28:25.599
Yeah, that didn't work.

00:28:25.680 --> 00:28:28.960
And I'm not saying this as a hater for Megan and Harry at all.

00:28:29.200 --> 00:28:34.880
I did a live last week where I was explaining I don't hate on them and I don't do press about Megan Markle.

00:28:34.960 --> 00:28:37.359
I will not do press about Meghan Markle and Harry anymore.

00:28:37.519 --> 00:28:42.000
As a matter of fact, I agreed to my last interview like two weeks ago and then I canceled it.

00:28:42.160 --> 00:28:43.599
I said, I'm not going to do it.

00:28:43.680 --> 00:28:54.079
And the reporter had already asked the questions, but I already decided ahead of time because all the questions about Meghan Markle, they always have a negative tone to them, which I get because they want clicks.

00:28:54.240 --> 00:28:55.759
And I'm not going to blame the reporter.

00:28:55.920 --> 00:28:58.559
The editor could have told her to write that way.

00:28:58.640 --> 00:29:01.359
But Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, they get clicks.

00:29:01.519 --> 00:29:03.279
So of course people are going to write about them.

00:29:03.359 --> 00:29:05.680
And you're going to get more clicks if it's negative.

00:29:05.920 --> 00:29:12.640
But these questions that I've received wanted me to think for Megan, like answer the question of why Megan's doing this or that.

00:29:12.720 --> 00:29:15.279
And this was about Fashion Week in Paris.

00:29:15.920 --> 00:29:19.680
How would I have any opinion whatsoever on what Megan is doing?

00:29:19.839 --> 00:29:25.200
Reputation is one thing, but to think and assume why she's making this moves, I don't care.

00:29:25.279 --> 00:29:27.039
And not to mention that has nothing to do with me.

00:29:27.200 --> 00:29:29.759
But I also decided I don't want to do press about them anymore.

00:29:29.839 --> 00:29:30.400
I'm not going to.

00:29:30.480 --> 00:29:37.680
They also talk about them because I'm fascinated watching them and their moves because they react to things that happen with the royal family.

00:29:37.759 --> 00:29:40.559
So I bet you anything, they are shaking in their boots.

00:29:40.799 --> 00:29:43.759
So we'll see down the road about that one.

00:29:43.920 --> 00:29:44.960
All right, everyone.

00:29:45.119 --> 00:29:48.319
That's all for this week on the podcast.

00:29:48.480 --> 00:29:49.680
Thanks so much for listening.

00:29:49.920 --> 00:29:50.640
Bye for now.