WEBVTT
00:02:39.399 --> 00:02:41.479
Hey there, welcome to the PR Breakdown.
00:02:41.479 --> 00:02:43.240
I'm your host, Molly McPherson.
00:02:43.240 --> 00:02:50.759
Today's episode is the first half of the top crises of 2025, good and bad.
00:02:50.759 --> 00:03:00.360
But I'll start off right now by saying the number one crisis for me is getting COVID the week before the holidays.
00:03:00.360 --> 00:03:05.159
So I'm starting off this episode apologizing for my voice right out the gate.
00:03:05.159 --> 00:03:11.800
If you want to watch this reveal on video, you can find it on YouTube and on Substack.
00:03:11.800 --> 00:03:13.719
I revealed it on a live chat.
00:03:13.719 --> 00:03:15.639
This is the podcast recording.
00:03:15.639 --> 00:03:24.920
If you want to hear the top five wins and losses of 2025, I'll reveal it this Friday, December 19th at 12 p.m.
00:03:24.920 --> 00:03:26.360
Eastern Time.
00:03:26.360 --> 00:03:32.519
Let's get to the first half of the list of the top 10 PR wins and fails of 2025.
00:03:32.519 --> 00:03:36.040
Before we jump in, here's how I'm judging this.
00:03:36.040 --> 00:03:37.719
This is my opinion only.
00:03:37.719 --> 00:03:41.639
It's based on how I look at reputation in my work every day.
00:03:41.639 --> 00:03:44.920
My metrics, strategy, what choices did they make?
00:03:44.920 --> 00:03:46.680
Did it help them or hurt them?
00:03:46.680 --> 00:03:47.800
Reputation.
00:03:47.800 --> 00:03:50.120
Did trust go up or down?
00:03:50.120 --> 00:03:58.839
Press, volume, tone, good press, bad press, or no press, and the big one: reputation versus legal wins.
00:03:58.839 --> 00:04:02.600
You know, people can win in court and still lose public trust.
00:04:02.600 --> 00:04:04.199
And that matters.
00:04:04.199 --> 00:04:09.000
My number 10 PR win is South Park.
00:04:09.000 --> 00:04:19.079
They dealt with major behind-the-scenes business drama with the Paramount Plus issues and distribution chaos, but they came out on top.
00:04:19.079 --> 00:04:25.719
Their current run, season 27, has been one of the strongest-rated seasons in years.
00:04:25.719 --> 00:04:35.000
Huge viewer spikes and several episodes pulling in a lot of positive press and new viewers.
00:04:35.000 --> 00:04:42.600
I've popped in and out of South Park because of my son Connor, but this season, he was home for the summer before he went back to college.
00:04:42.600 --> 00:04:48.439
We were watching skewing the White House, Trump with Satan's child.
00:04:48.439 --> 00:04:51.319
There's so many takes that are absolutely hysterical.
00:04:51.319 --> 00:04:56.680
And the reason why it's a win is because I think it is bringing in so many viewers.
00:04:56.680 --> 00:05:00.839
Now, they did have one big reputational challenge.
00:05:00.839 --> 00:05:06.279
Episode two, which was my favorite episode, it was the Got A Nut episode.
00:05:06.279 --> 00:05:11.879
They uh highlighted an award for young master debaters.
00:05:11.879 --> 00:05:19.560
They had Cartman modeling himself as Charlie Kirk as a campus debate persona.
00:05:19.560 --> 00:05:24.360
And that was really the first time I understood who Charlie Kirk was.
00:05:24.360 --> 00:05:28.759
And then all of a sudden, he ended up murdered, which meant that could have been a lot of trouble for South Park.
00:05:28.759 --> 00:05:32.680
But they pulled the episode and kept moving on.
00:05:32.680 --> 00:05:46.280
So why it's a win is because they've stayed culturally central and relevant and also politically dangerous, which is all about their whole brand promise.
00:05:46.280 --> 00:05:48.040
That's why we're calling it a win.
00:05:48.040 --> 00:05:51.879
Number 10 PR fail, cracker barrel.
00:05:51.879 --> 00:06:05.560
In August, the restaurant chain rolled out a simplified logo and a broader modernization plan that removed the barrel, the old timer mascot, and the old country store type wording.
00:06:05.560 --> 00:06:11.160
That triggered heavy criticism, particularly from conservative commentators.
00:06:11.160 --> 00:06:15.879
So there was a very steep one-day drop around 10, 12%.
00:06:15.879 --> 00:06:28.360
So that logo shift was framed in the right-wing media as going woke, which of course then revives a long-running culture war narrative.
00:06:28.360 --> 00:06:29.639
It was a big story.
00:06:29.639 --> 00:06:33.480
And when I mention the press metric, some of it is kind of personal.
00:06:33.480 --> 00:06:36.040
I look at when the press reaches out to me.
00:06:36.040 --> 00:06:37.480
There are certain stories out there.
00:06:37.480 --> 00:06:42.840
All of a sudden, every press outlet is getting a hold of me, usually like national networks.
00:06:42.840 --> 00:06:45.000
And that was definitely the case for this one.
00:06:45.000 --> 00:06:50.840
I ended up doing an interview with NBC, and it aired on the Today Show.
00:06:50.840 --> 00:07:09.560
The CEO of Cracker Barrel told investors that the last few months have been difficult, emphasized that guest trust was damaged, and said their playbook now is really just going back to that Southern Americana positioning in an effort to win back traffic.
00:07:09.560 --> 00:07:18.680
I had people tell me in my DMs about people who did the brand redesign, and they said they were absolutely mortified.
00:07:18.680 --> 00:07:25.240
The number nine PR win, this is the one that I didn't want to say on the live because I thought, oh, I'm going to get hate from this one.
00:07:25.240 --> 00:07:26.759
Candace Owens.
00:07:26.759 --> 00:07:34.040
And it's not because I agree with her, because I don't, but strategically, she executed a brutal pivot.
00:07:34.040 --> 00:07:42.199
Now, if you're not familiar with Owens, she rose to prominence in the late 2010s through viral videos and appearances defending Donald Trump.
00:07:42.199 --> 00:07:49.319
She attacked Black Lives Matter, and she argued that systemic racism is overstated.
00:07:49.319 --> 00:07:54.840
She's worked with organizations like Turning Point USA.
00:07:54.840 --> 00:08:01.800
And she's hosted shows and podcasts for right-leaning outlets, including the Daily Wire, where she was let go from there.
00:08:01.800 --> 00:08:09.960
But she has developed a large social media following that treats her as a key right-wing influencer.
00:08:09.960 --> 00:08:15.879
But she has shifted of late into more general pop culture stories.
00:08:15.879 --> 00:08:20.600
Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, Justin Baldone, Megan Markle.
00:08:20.600 --> 00:08:22.120
She's just like a Megan Kelly.
00:08:22.120 --> 00:08:24.439
She wants to get the views and the clicks.
00:08:24.439 --> 00:08:30.840
So she's moved from being a niche political figure into an algorithm-dominating pop culture commentary.
00:08:30.840 --> 00:08:32.759
And it worked.
00:08:32.759 --> 00:08:43.240
And now she's even bigger because she is the villain in the Erica Kirk story, where a lot of people view Erica Kirk as the villain.
00:08:43.240 --> 00:08:53.000
Many people are noticing that Erica Kirk now is doing a lot of higher profile interviews, Fox News, the recent CBS, Barry Weiss Town Hall.
00:08:53.000 --> 00:08:55.720
She was also part of the New York Times Book Summit.
00:08:55.720 --> 00:09:01.480
But she's condemning these conspiracy theories about Charlie Kirk's killing.
00:09:01.480 --> 00:09:06.519
And she's explicitly saying to Owens and others to stop.
00:09:07.559 --> 00:09:09.480
The podcaster Candace Owens.
00:09:09.480 --> 00:09:10.120
Okay.
00:09:10.120 --> 00:09:15.319
At one time, a friend of Charlie's, at one time, an employee of Turning Point.
00:09:15.319 --> 00:09:18.759
She has been one of the main peddlers of these conspiracies.
00:09:18.759 --> 00:09:21.159
And she is making a huge amount of money on it.
00:09:21.159 --> 00:09:24.759
She is building her business off of these lies.
00:09:24.759 --> 00:09:32.759
What do you want to say to her and the other people that are putting these lies out into the world right now?
00:09:32.759 --> 00:09:34.039
Stop.
00:09:34.039 --> 00:09:37.079
That's it.
00:09:37.079 --> 00:09:38.759
That's all I have to say.
00:09:38.759 --> 00:09:40.199
Stop.
00:09:41.319 --> 00:09:42.919
Candace Owens is responding.
00:09:42.919 --> 00:09:46.120
She's using her show and platforms to double down.
00:09:46.120 --> 00:09:48.679
She's implying that there's an inside job.
00:09:48.679 --> 00:09:56.759
She's questioning Turning Points finances, releasing texts involving Charlie to support her suspicions.
00:09:56.759 --> 00:10:09.879
She's also gone very personal against Erica Kirk, accusing her of quote, Meghan Markle syndrome, which is you want privacy but publicity and on your own terms.
00:10:09.879 --> 00:10:19.240
And she compares Erica's appeals for deference as a widow to the tactics that Owens used to complain about around Black Lives Matter.
00:10:19.240 --> 00:10:26.840
The current state of the feud, if you're watching it, I have to give the nod to Candace Owens here because she's using evidence.
00:10:26.840 --> 00:10:33.639
She's does have a prior relationship with Charlie Kirk, and it is getting her a lot of the views.
00:10:33.639 --> 00:10:37.240
And so at the end of 2025, that's a PR win.
00:10:37.240 --> 00:10:42.600
Loser number nine, Blue Origin, and every person on that flight.
00:10:42.600 --> 00:10:51.240
You remember the Blue Origin flight that launched an all-female crew, including Gail King and Katie Perry.
00:10:51.240 --> 00:10:54.360
This took place in April of this year.
00:10:54.360 --> 00:10:56.680
It launched in West Texas.
00:10:56.680 --> 00:11:00.279
It was in space a little over 10 minutes.
00:11:00.279 --> 00:11:07.159
But the reason why this was such a big fail, a massive fail, were the reputational casualties.
00:11:07.159 --> 00:11:12.279
Lauren Sanchez, who's now Lauren Sanchez Bezos, of course, married to Jeff Bezos.
00:11:12.279 --> 00:11:21.240
She didn't receive as much reputational blowback because this type of grasp for relevance is kind of part of her brand, so it fits.
00:11:21.240 --> 00:11:28.039
But Katy Perry, Gail King, they lost serious reputational currency doing this flight.
00:11:28.039 --> 00:11:30.919
As most people saw, it wasn't really going into space.
00:11:30.919 --> 00:11:39.560
It was a brief micro gravity period where people could float around a cabin when they can look back at Earth.
00:11:39.560 --> 00:11:42.840
But there were a lot of camera-friendly activities.
00:11:42.840 --> 00:11:47.000
And Gail King later talked about being both terrified and exhilarated.
00:11:47.000 --> 00:11:53.960
Katy Perry made headlines because she was singing a snippet of what a wonderful world.
00:11:53.960 --> 00:11:58.039
And she brought the Daisy in space and referred back to her daughter, Daisy.
00:11:58.039 --> 00:12:04.200
Then when the capsule and the booster came and landed safely, King and Perry both kissing the ground.
00:12:04.200 --> 00:12:09.159
I just know it was a massive, massive fail.
00:12:09.159 --> 00:12:15.159
Winner number eight, a name I never would have put on this list, but it's Tatiana Schlossberg.
00:12:15.159 --> 00:12:18.519
And by extension, Caroline Kennedy, her mother.
00:12:18.519 --> 00:12:20.120
This isn't a PR crisis.
00:12:20.120 --> 00:12:24.680
It's a life crisis, but the communication was strategically brilliant.
00:12:24.680 --> 00:12:27.960
She published an essay in The New Yorker.
00:12:27.960 --> 00:12:30.680
It was published on November 22nd.
00:12:30.680 --> 00:12:31.720
That's a symbolic date.
00:12:31.720 --> 00:12:34.360
It was the anniversary of the JFK assassination.
00:12:34.360 --> 00:12:37.480
Saturday releases, not something common.
00:12:37.480 --> 00:12:38.919
You don't typically see that.
00:12:38.919 --> 00:12:45.879
But in this case, this release owned the Sunday News Cycle and it carried into the week.
00:12:45.879 --> 00:13:01.159
And her piece emphasized such substance about illness and grief and motherhood and fear and mortality, but then widening that emotional frame to her mother, Caroline Kennedy, and everything that she's gone through.
00:13:01.159 --> 00:13:05.639
She lost her father to an assassin's bullet, her uncle to an assassin's bullet.
00:13:05.639 --> 00:13:10.360
She lost her mother, Jacqueline Onassis, at a very young age.
00:13:10.360 --> 00:13:14.919
She was in her 60s when she died, but she also lost her brother, JFK Jr.
00:13:14.919 --> 00:13:22.440
in 1999, of course, on a flight over the Vineyard Sound, along with his wife, Carolyn, and her sister.
00:13:22.440 --> 00:13:25.240
Caroline Kennedy has experienced a lot of grief.
00:13:25.240 --> 00:13:28.759
And for Tatiana to bring her in was important.
00:13:28.759 --> 00:13:36.919
But it also created a very controlled line of demarcation between Caroline Kennedy and Robert F.
00:13:36.919 --> 00:13:37.799
Kennedy Jr.
00:13:37.799 --> 00:13:54.440
Caroline Kennedy, back in January of 2025, she made a plea, put it on video, and she's normally social media shy to say that Congress should not confirm her first cousin, RFK Jr., to be the head of Health and Human Services.
00:13:54.440 --> 00:13:58.279
She called him a predator and then laid it out.
00:13:58.279 --> 00:14:05.159
In the live chat Herb in the community, he said this is the Kennedys are Molly's Roman Empire.
00:14:05.159 --> 00:14:08.279
And that's somewhat true because I know a lot about the Kennedys.
00:14:08.279 --> 00:14:12.120
I don't even need to research any of it because I know so much about it.
00:14:12.120 --> 00:14:22.200
But there has always been a line between the RFK kids and the JFK kids, that Jackie Onassis is the one who put that line there.
00:14:22.200 --> 00:14:29.320
She felt, if you read history and the books, that Ethel and RFK's kids were kind of wild.
00:14:29.320 --> 00:14:33.799
And when RFK was killed, there were 12 kids, or actually 11.
00:14:33.799 --> 00:14:40.840
Ethel, his wife, was pregnant with their last child worry, but they always were just kind of wild children.
00:14:40.840 --> 00:14:46.519
Jackie Kennedy wanted to separate her two kids from that kind of rabble-rousing crew.
00:14:46.519 --> 00:14:48.279
And she did a very good job of that.
00:14:48.279 --> 00:14:52.120
There's just always been a stigma with that side of the family, and it continues.
00:14:52.120 --> 00:14:58.200
And Caroline Kennedy and Tatiana Slosberg made sure that line remained.
00:14:58.200 --> 00:15:00.840
Which leads us to the number eight PR loss.
00:15:00.840 --> 00:15:02.279
That's RFK Jr.
00:15:02.279 --> 00:15:06.759
And by extension, his wife Cheryl Hines and Olivia Nootsi.
00:15:06.759 --> 00:15:13.639
RFK Jr.'s public reputation and behavior has been in the headlines for decades.
00:15:13.639 --> 00:15:18.759
His wife Cheryl Hines recently had to take the reputational fallout by proximity.
00:15:18.759 --> 00:15:29.399
She had to go out and do the damage control when the story about Olivia Nootsi, so she was a fast-rising Washington correspondent.
00:15:29.399 --> 00:15:36.039
She wrote for New York Magazine, and she's profiled a lot of politicians, including RFK Jr.
00:15:36.039 --> 00:15:42.680
And in 2024, it emerged that she had undisclosed a quote, personal digital relationship with Robert F.
00:15:42.680 --> 00:15:43.720
Kennedy Jr.
00:15:43.720 --> 00:15:46.360
while covering his presidential campaign.
00:15:46.360 --> 00:15:50.680
So that led New York Magazine to put her on leave and then part ways with her.
00:15:50.680 --> 00:15:59.639
Since then, her relationship with her fiance, Ryan Lizza, he worked for Politico, those two were going back and forth with each other.
00:15:59.639 --> 00:16:03.720
So that became a personal entanglement, to put it lightly.
00:16:03.720 --> 00:16:15.320
Then Vanity Fair came in, named her as a West Coast editor, just as Simon and Schuster announced that her memoir, American Canto about Trump and RFK Jr.
00:16:15.320 --> 00:16:19.639
and her own implosion, which it definitely is.
00:16:19.639 --> 00:16:23.399
She would make my list, but she's so late and not that many people know her.
00:16:23.399 --> 00:16:25.560
She'd probably be in my top 20 list.
00:16:25.560 --> 00:16:28.840
But she is a part of the RFK Jr.
00:16:28.840 --> 00:16:29.560
story.
00:16:29.560 --> 00:16:33.480
So she's framing it now that she admitted doing something wrong.
00:16:33.480 --> 00:16:35.480
But if you know RFK Jr.
00:16:35.480 --> 00:16:39.720
and how he works, it is absolutely playbook.
00:16:39.720 --> 00:16:46.039
And that's the reason why he is on this list right now, because it seems as if every turn with RFK Jr.
00:16:46.039 --> 00:16:53.000
chips away at the legacy, not only the Kennedy family, but his father, Robert Francis Kennedy.
00:16:53.000 --> 00:16:55.480
And that's what puts him on this list.
00:16:55.480 --> 00:17:00.200
A PR winner, somewhat controversial when I announced it on my live chat.
00:17:00.200 --> 00:17:02.600
Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban.
00:17:02.600 --> 00:17:13.639
The reason why I added them as a PR win is because they are the couple that shows how to manage a long-term celebrity split without detonating your entire brand.
00:17:13.639 --> 00:17:27.000
Nicole Kidman is in the middle of divorcing Keith Urban after their separation went public on September 30th, citing irreconcilable differences after 19 years of marriage and two daughters together.
00:17:27.000 --> 00:17:34.919
Now, online there's a lot of chatters of affair rumors, not just with Keith Urban, but also with Nicole, more on Keith's side.
00:17:34.919 --> 00:17:36.759
Nicole is solidly a list.
00:17:36.759 --> 00:17:40.519
Keith, I'd say, is a list adjacent.
00:17:40.519 --> 00:17:48.759
But the two of them together were able to navigate this without letting it blow up, which is the reason why I consider it a win.
00:17:48.759 --> 00:17:52.759
They didn't feed the machine, they managed it.
00:17:52.759 --> 00:17:55.079
Loser number seven.
00:17:55.079 --> 00:18:04.119
Now, this person could also be on a PR win list, but overall he's going to be on the loser list because I think he's going to pay for things down the road.
00:18:04.119 --> 00:18:11.480
And even though this guy has a lot of fans and a lot of people in his corner, he's still getting a lot of losses here.
00:18:11.480 --> 00:18:13.319
And that is Justin Baldone.
00:18:13.319 --> 00:18:28.680
As you know, he is deeply embroiled in an ongoing legal battle with his It Ends With Us co-star Blake Lively, who is suing him and Wayfair, his production company that he worked with, for sexual harassment, retaliation, and alleged smear campaign.
00:18:28.680 --> 00:18:39.319
Right now, Blake Lively is seeking more than $160 million in a suit against him for reputational damage.
00:18:39.319 --> 00:18:43.480
Now, there's been a lot of back and forth with the legal cases.
00:18:43.480 --> 00:18:55.720
His countersuit against Lively in the New York Times was dismissed in mid-2025, but in the civil trial on her claims has been pushed to May 2026 because of the judge's calendar.
00:18:55.720 --> 00:19:08.680
The overall PR industry problem is alleging that a crisis firm who worked with Justin Baldone engaged in a broader Aster Turf online campaign against Blake Lively.
00:19:08.680 --> 00:19:19.480
I have strongly come out and said that I do not believe that Justin Baldoney's team was a part of this massive PR smear campaign.
00:19:19.480 --> 00:19:31.559
I think a lot of celebrities out there and publicists engage in these negative back and forth campaigns, but I really believe that this entire lawsuit stemmed from Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds.
00:19:31.559 --> 00:19:33.799
More specifically, Ryan Reynolds.
00:19:33.799 --> 00:19:37.640
I don't think he liked how close Blake and Justin Baldone were.
00:19:37.640 --> 00:19:44.200
But the fallout has hit Justin Baldone very hard because right now he is not working.
00:19:44.200 --> 00:19:49.559
I just did an interview with People Magazine that should be out soon if it's not out already.
00:19:49.559 --> 00:19:53.559
And we were discussing the fact that he does not have a lot of work.
00:19:53.559 --> 00:19:55.880
He's taken a major financial hit.
00:19:55.880 --> 00:20:05.400
And reputationally, studios might bulk working with him, even though the public is there's a big significant group of the public who are on his side.
00:20:05.400 --> 00:20:12.359
I think legally and financially, he's taking big losses, regardless of the public sentiment.
00:20:12.359 --> 00:20:20.039
So stepping out of the spotlight, whether voluntary or not, can read his dignity and that contrast matters.
00:20:20.039 --> 00:20:23.079
However, in the long run, I think he's taken a huge hit.
00:20:23.079 --> 00:20:27.480
PR winner number six, Chris Martin and Coldplay.
00:20:27.480 --> 00:20:38.839
At a July 2025 Coldplay show at Gillette Stadium, the camera landed on astronomer CEO Andy Byron and his HR chief people person, Kristen Cabot.
00:20:39.160 --> 00:20:40.519
Oh, look at these two.
00:20:40.519 --> 00:20:41.720
All right, come on.
00:20:41.720 --> 00:20:42.519
You're okay?
00:20:42.519 --> 00:20:43.480
Oh, what?
00:20:43.480 --> 00:20:48.440
Either they're having an affair or they're just very shunning.
00:20:48.759 --> 00:20:53.079
And when they realized they were on screen, they pulled apart and Chris Martin joked.
00:20:53.079 --> 00:21:08.680
That clip went viral, and Internet sluice did their job, identified both executives, and within days, Byron resigned or was forced to resign, followed by Cabot as the company astronomer tried to contain the fallout.
00:21:08.680 --> 00:21:20.920
The reason why I put him as a PR win is because on later tour stops, Martin briefly addressed the incident in one of those moments that you knew people would pick up online, and then that would be shared virally.
00:21:20.920 --> 00:21:25.880
But it was a way for him not to come out with a statement about it.
00:21:25.880 --> 00:21:28.039
He could stay out of the mix.
00:21:28.039 --> 00:21:49.000
And a lot of press out there, including the BBC, they framed the whole saga as essentially neutral or even mildly positive for Coldplay's brand because it casts Martin as an unwitting catalyst rather than a villain and focused the scrutiny instead on astronomer leadership and PR strategy, which is exactly where it belonged.
00:21:49.000 --> 00:21:50.359
And that's why it's a win.
00:21:50.359 --> 00:21:53.319
He got the awareness bump without becoming the villain.
00:21:53.319 --> 00:21:56.440
And PR loser number six, Diddy.
00:21:56.440 --> 00:22:01.000
From a reputation standpoint, Sean Combs is effectively in R.
00:22:01.000 --> 00:22:02.440
Kelly territory right now.
00:22:02.440 --> 00:22:05.079
His brand is radioactive.
00:22:05.079 --> 00:22:07.640
His business empire has been gutted.
00:22:07.640 --> 00:22:17.559
The serious conviction that happened in July 2025 when he was convicted on two prostitution-related counts tied to his so-called freak-off parties.
00:22:17.559 --> 00:22:24.839
So he was acquitted of the marquee headline racketeering and sex trafficking conspiracy charges.
00:22:24.839 --> 00:22:28.200
Since then, he's been sentenced to a multi year prison term.
00:22:28.200 --> 00:22:38.519
A list collaborators, brands, institutions will likely Distance themselves from Diddy because they don't want to be associated with that type of risk.
00:22:38.519 --> 00:22:43.720
It far outweighs any upside for branding with Diddy.
00:22:43.720 --> 00:22:45.079
It's not just a scandal.
00:22:45.079 --> 00:22:47.559
It's like a seated reputational tune.
00:22:47.559 --> 00:22:53.319
There's no comeback narrative that feels plausible right now for Diddy.
00:22:53.319 --> 00:22:54.440
All right, everyone.
00:22:54.440 --> 00:23:00.440
Thank you so much for your patience with my voice as I work through this list.
00:23:00.440 --> 00:23:06.839
Next week's episode will be the PR wins and losses one through five.
00:23:06.839 --> 00:23:11.400
But if you want to know what they are a little bit early, you can tune into my Substack.
00:23:11.400 --> 00:23:15.079
You can find me at Molly McPherson, and we'll have a live chat.
00:23:15.079 --> 00:23:24.440
That way you can jump in and give your feedback on what you think about the list, what you think of my choices, and who you think I might have missed.
00:23:24.440 --> 00:23:29.319
You can join me on Substack on Friday, December 19th at 12 p.m.
00:23:29.319 --> 00:23:30.519
Eastern Time.
00:23:30.519 --> 00:23:33.559
Otherwise, I'll see you here next week.
00:23:33.559 --> 00:23:34.920
Bye for now.