Nov. 26, 2025

Trump, Summers, Spacey, and Markle: Who Owned It and Who Faked It

Trump, Summers, Spacey, and Markle: Who Owned It and Who Faked It

This week’s episode dives into a crowded lineup of public figures who all managed to confuse PR maneuvering with actual accountability: President Trump’s “quiet piggy” moment on Air Force One and the broader pattern behind his attacks on women in the press, Larry Summers’ fog-filled non-apology after his Epstein emails resurfaced, Pope Leo XIV’s straightforward call for human dignity contrasted with a White House response that dodged the moral point entirely, Kevin Spacey’s nightclub comeback performance and his ongoing attempt to swap personal suffering for responsibility, and Meghan Markle’s Harper’s Bazaar profile, complete with an Upper East Side house manager announcing “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” to an empty room. It’s a week full of case studies in what happens when leaders and celebrities choose optics over truth, and why audiences, voters, and stakeholders are paying closer attention to who names their missteps and who tries to PR their way out of them.

Want More Behind the Breakdown?
Follow The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson on Substack for early access to podcast episodes, exclusive member chats, weekly lives, and monthly workshops that go deeper than the mic. It's the insider’s hub for communicators who want strategy with spine—and a little side-eye where it counts.

Follow Molly on Substack
Subscribe to Molly's Weekly Newsletter
Subscribe to Molly's Live Events Calendar.

Need a Keynote Speaker? Drawing from real-world PR battles, Molly delivers the same engaging stories and hard-won crisis insights from the podcast to your live audience. Click here to book Molly for your next meeting.

This podcast is supported by Muck Rack, the PR management platform I use to monitor media coverage, track journalist activity, and inform high-stakes strategy with real-time data. Click here to try Muck Rack for yourself.


Follow & Connect with Molly:

00:06 - Framing The Case Studies

02:19 - The Blunt Question: Accountability Or PR

05:11 - Trump, Epstein Files, And Media Attacks

09:03 - How Insults Signal Narrative Panic

12:02 - One-Lane Strategy Under Scrutiny

16:12 - Larry Summers And The Fog Apology

21:00 - What Real Accountability Sounds Like

WEBVTT

00:00:06.080 --> 00:00:14.000
This week, let's look at some case studies showing things that should be obvious, but somehow they never are.

00:00:14.000 --> 00:00:19.120
We're putting a handful of big stories on the table and asking the same blunt question every time.

00:00:19.120 --> 00:00:24.879
Was this actual accountability or just slick PR dressed up as virtue?

00:00:24.879 --> 00:00:26.960
And the lineup is crowded.

00:00:26.960 --> 00:00:29.359
We have Trump, the Epstein Files.

00:00:29.359 --> 00:00:31.359
I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I know.

00:00:31.359 --> 00:00:35.840
The quiet piggy moment that did not land softly.

00:00:35.840 --> 00:00:42.159
We have a former Harvard president with an apology that floated away like a balloon.

00:00:42.159 --> 00:00:50.960
We have a certain usual suspect who wants sympathy, who still does not have a single ounce of introspection.

00:00:50.960 --> 00:00:54.960
We have our Pope with a very simple message.

00:00:54.960 --> 00:01:05.120
And because the universe knew I was getting ready to record, I got an email showing Megan Markle has a new profile in Harper's Bazaar.

00:01:05.120 --> 00:01:15.040
I read the entire article before this recording, and there was one part that dying, we just, I just have to talk about that briefly.

00:01:15.040 --> 00:01:17.040
Because here's why all of this matters.

00:01:17.040 --> 00:01:23.359
If you manage a brand, a campaign, or a crisis, you get judged the same way many of these public figures do.

00:01:23.359 --> 00:01:29.840
People pay attention to who you protect, whose dignity you acknowledge, and whether you choose truth over convenience.

00:01:29.840 --> 00:01:31.840
That's the whole game.

00:01:31.840 --> 00:01:32.959
Hey there, everyone.

00:01:32.959 --> 00:01:34.400
Welcome to the PR Breakdown.

00:01:34.400 --> 00:01:35.920
I'm your host, Molly McPherson.

00:01:35.920 --> 00:01:42.239
I am a crisis manager by day and always looking to be that human lie detector by night.

00:01:42.239 --> 00:01:46.079
And then, of course, I put all of it on social media.

00:01:46.079 --> 00:01:50.959
But right now, we're with the podcast and we have to get to all these case studies.

00:01:50.959 --> 00:01:59.040
Let's start with the loudest one because when someone loses control of their narrative, you can practically hear the gears grinding.

00:01:59.040 --> 00:02:06.000
And in President Trump's case, those gears are grinding loud enough to show in the data.

00:02:06.000 --> 00:02:13.759
Real clear polling has him at a 55% disapproval rating at the time of this recording.

00:02:13.759 --> 00:02:22.319
This is what happens when you keep picking fights that makes the public and your mega public wince.

00:02:22.319 --> 00:02:25.680
I know you all saw the headlines, you probably saw the video.

00:02:25.680 --> 00:02:43.840
Bloomberg White House correspondent Catherine Lucy, you probably didn't know the name before, like many of us, but we do now because she's in the press, because she was part of a press gaggle on Air Force One, and she was pressing President Trump about the Epstein files, and this is what he had to say.

00:02:43.840 --> 00:02:52.159
Yes, completely reprehensible, but apparently not to his own team.

00:02:52.159 --> 00:02:54.400
The White House defended him.

00:02:54.400 --> 00:02:59.360
They released a statement saying that the reporter behaved in an inappropriate and unprofessional way.

00:02:59.360 --> 00:03:01.840
If you're gonna give it, you have to take it.

00:03:01.840 --> 00:03:07.360
And that wasn't just one person in defense of what Trump did.

00:03:07.360 --> 00:03:11.120
There was Representative Maria Elvira Salazar.

00:03:11.120 --> 00:03:20.000
She was on Jake Tapper's program, The Lead on CNN, and she as well was trying to justify President Trump's behavior.

00:03:20.000 --> 00:03:20.960
Take a listen.

00:03:21.439 --> 00:03:27.840
President Trump is a very picturesque and difficult and different type of politician.

00:03:28.159 --> 00:03:33.759
If you saw the clip, Jake Tapper was just sitting there in stunned belief.

00:03:33.759 --> 00:03:37.360
And the Quiet Piggy comment wasn't a one-off.

00:03:37.360 --> 00:03:40.400
In the Oval Office, I'm sure many of you saw this headline as well.

00:03:40.400 --> 00:03:48.479
ABC's Mary Bruce asked the Saudi Crown Prince about the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, a journalist, a fellow journalist.

00:03:48.479 --> 00:03:51.039
Then Trump jumped in and scolded her.

00:03:51.039 --> 00:04:02.000
What does this show?

00:04:02.000 --> 00:04:03.120
Two things.

00:04:03.120 --> 00:04:06.639
One, Trump has a long-standing problem with the press.

00:04:06.639 --> 00:04:11.840
But two, when the journalist is a woman, that problem becomes a pattern.

00:04:11.840 --> 00:04:19.439
The National Press Club weighed in fast, reminding the public that minimizing the murder of a journalist is not just bad optics.

00:04:19.439 --> 00:04:20.800
It's dangerous.

00:04:20.800 --> 00:04:29.199
Their words, quote, statements like these undermine the principle that journalists must be able to work without fear.

00:04:29.199 --> 00:04:30.800
Here's the kicker.

00:04:30.800 --> 00:04:34.800
Every single time he lashes out like this, he is not winning the moment.

00:04:34.800 --> 00:04:40.079
He's confirming the suspicion baked into that 55% disapproval rating.

00:04:40.079 --> 00:04:46.639
People do not trust leaders who attack the person asking the question instead of answering it.

00:04:46.639 --> 00:04:52.399
He still has his base, but the strength of that base is starting to fissure.

00:04:52.399 --> 00:05:00.240
That quiet piggy insult gave us a glimpse into the panic, into the White House.

00:05:00.240 --> 00:05:14.480
It gives us, and that quiet piggy insult, some people could say it's part of the ongoing distraction of Trump flooding the zone with all the different distractions to distract away from the Epstein files.

00:05:14.480 --> 00:05:24.319
Some could argue that, but watching it, the lashing of it, particularly for people who've been there on the other side of that lashing, you felt it.

00:05:24.319 --> 00:05:28.720
We all were Catherine Lucy from Bloomberg when that happened.

00:05:28.720 --> 00:05:35.839
Some may say, okay, it shifts the story from why won't you release the files to, hey, look at these rude journalists.

00:05:35.839 --> 00:05:45.920
He certainly wants that to be a part of the narrative, to replace the Epstein Files conversation as the reminder of where this whole altercation started.

00:05:45.920 --> 00:05:49.360
But a tactic only works when you're driving the narrative.

00:05:49.360 --> 00:05:52.319
And he's not driving any narrative right now.

00:05:52.319 --> 00:05:54.800
He is scrambling.

00:05:54.800 --> 00:06:00.240
So let's put this in your zone, in your workplace, or even in your life.

00:06:00.240 --> 00:06:02.639
One lane, always one lane.

00:06:02.639 --> 00:06:19.519
If you are dealing with an organization or with a leader who is under heavy, heavy scrutiny, your job in communications as the strategic advisor is to get them to take one lane, always one lane, that you support X, that transparency matters.

00:06:19.519 --> 00:06:26.560
In this case, I don't think there's any convincing President Trump that we need to support releasing the files.

00:06:26.560 --> 00:06:35.279
I don't think there's ever going to be a way that anyone can convince Trump that this is the right thing to do, even though he's now coming out and saying that he supports releasing it.

00:06:35.279 --> 00:06:43.920
Of course, he's switching the narrative that he wants to highlight the other people in there, like former president Bill Clinton and Larry Summers.

00:06:43.920 --> 00:06:46.639
There's so much flailing and so many insults.

00:06:46.639 --> 00:07:02.399
And here's a lesson if you're in the position of managing a reputation, whether it's your own or working for an organization, when you attack the messenger, the public stakeholders, your constituents, are going to assume that the person delivering the message is the problem.

00:07:02.399 --> 00:07:06.319
It's never who they're pointing to, it's always the opposite.

00:07:06.319 --> 00:07:12.160
So if the first instinct is to insult the person asking the question, you've already answered it, haven't you?

00:07:12.160 --> 00:07:19.600
And speaking of one of the people who President Trump was trying to use as a deflection, we have Larry Summers.

00:07:19.600 --> 00:07:23.040
Last week we had a number of things happen around him.

00:07:23.040 --> 00:07:24.560
We haven't heard much.

00:07:24.560 --> 00:07:31.439
Larry Summers resigned from the OpenAI board after emails showed a long correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein.

00:07:31.439 --> 00:07:38.079
One email had Summers asking Epstein for advice about a young woman who he called a mentee.

00:07:38.079 --> 00:07:42.160
She was affiliated with him at Harvard.

00:07:42.160 --> 00:07:48.639
And I don't even want to bring her her name into the mix because she shouldn't be the one who's being dragged into any of it.

00:07:48.639 --> 00:07:51.920
But Larry Summers was looking for a wingman.

00:07:51.920 --> 00:07:53.680
And that wingman was Jeffrey Epstein.

00:07:53.680 --> 00:07:57.040
Oh, and by the way, Larry Summers was married as he was doing all this.

00:07:57.040 --> 00:07:59.120
Of course, his name is going to come out.

00:07:59.120 --> 00:08:00.639
So his name is in the emails.

00:08:00.639 --> 00:08:07.279
It's not surprising his name has been attached to these emails before, but this was the time that he had to come out and make statements.

00:08:07.279 --> 00:08:08.879
He issued two of them.

00:08:08.879 --> 00:08:16.079
The first one that came out earlier last week, the simple language that we, it's the language we always see in these types of statements.

00:08:16.079 --> 00:08:17.279
I'm deeply ashamed.

00:08:17.279 --> 00:08:22.480
I take full responsibility, and I'm stepping back from public commitments.

00:08:22.480 --> 00:08:24.079
It's the same script.

00:08:24.079 --> 00:08:28.240
But one of the things he didn't do is step back from his teaching at Harvard.

00:08:28.240 --> 00:08:32.320
It was his tie to that institution which gives him power.

00:08:32.320 --> 00:08:35.919
He was going to let go of a lot of things, but that he wasn't going to let go of.

00:08:35.919 --> 00:08:39.600
But in that statement, he never names what he did.

00:08:39.600 --> 00:08:41.360
He never names who he harmed.

00:08:41.360 --> 00:08:44.000
He never names the power imbalance.

00:08:44.000 --> 00:08:52.480
Instead, he centers on his feelings, his shame, his burden, which is how you get the fog apology.

00:08:52.480 --> 00:08:56.159
Plenty of emotion, but there's no information.

00:08:56.159 --> 00:08:59.039
Here's what a better move would have looked like.

00:08:59.039 --> 00:09:02.879
It's I maintained a relationship with a convicted offender.

00:09:02.879 --> 00:09:06.159
I involved someone I had a responsibility to protect.

00:09:06.159 --> 00:09:07.120
That was wrong.

00:09:07.120 --> 00:09:10.480
And here are the steps I will take to repair the harm.

00:09:10.480 --> 00:09:14.559
It's direct, it's human, it's hard to wriggle out of.

00:09:14.559 --> 00:09:21.840
If you saw online, there was a student in his Harvard class who filmed his apology.

00:09:21.840 --> 00:09:23.519
This is what it sounds like.

00:09:29.679 --> 00:09:34.480
Uh with respect to what I did in communication with Mr.

00:09:34.480 --> 00:09:35.360
Epstein.

00:09:36.320 --> 00:09:42.879
Could you imagine sitting in that class trying to take him seriously with authority?

00:09:42.879 --> 00:09:45.279
This is why people have to leave.

00:09:45.279 --> 00:09:47.440
It's not a cancel culture.

00:09:47.440 --> 00:09:51.120
It's that without accountability, people lose credibility.

00:09:51.120 --> 00:09:54.000
You can't sit in that seat anymore.

00:09:54.000 --> 00:09:57.360
So here's the lesson for managing a reputation.

00:09:57.360 --> 00:10:02.720
Vague apologies don't close a crisis, they fertilize it.

00:10:02.720 --> 00:10:09.120
If you cannot name what you did, the public will assume it is worse than what they already know.

00:10:09.120 --> 00:10:12.159
So let's flip to a totally different dynamic.

00:10:12.159 --> 00:10:17.200
Someone raising a moral point and an institution trying to answer it with now.

00:10:17.200 --> 00:10:19.679
Let's flip to a totally different dynamic.

00:10:19.679 --> 00:10:26.639
I'm talking about Pope Leo XIV, our guy from Chicago, Chi Town.

00:10:26.639 --> 00:10:28.879
He is publicly backing the U.S.

00:10:28.879 --> 00:10:34.799
Catholic bishops after they condemned the Trump administration's mass deportation policies.

00:10:34.799 --> 00:10:37.679
And he did not mince words.

00:10:37.679 --> 00:10:41.279
His message was plain and simple.

00:10:41.279 --> 00:10:44.559
Treat people with dignity.

00:10:44.559 --> 00:10:47.600
Treat immigrants humanely.

00:10:47.600 --> 00:10:49.120
This is what he said.

00:10:49.120 --> 00:10:56.080
He added that recent anti-migrant measures in the U.S.

00:10:56.080 --> 00:10:59.279
are treating people in a way that is extremely disrespectful.

00:10:59.279 --> 00:11:03.360
And he's urging that migrants be treated with humanity and dignity.

00:11:03.360 --> 00:11:07.600
In other words, he said the quiet moral premise out loud.

00:11:07.600 --> 00:11:16.399
People are not policy lovers or victims to be used to get your political agenda out there.

00:11:16.399 --> 00:11:18.639
They are people.

00:11:18.639 --> 00:11:38.399
She said, I would reject that there is inhumane treatment of illegal immigrants in the United States under this administration.

00:11:38.399 --> 00:11:39.919
You know what?

00:11:39.919 --> 00:11:42.480
As a Catholic, I could not say that.

00:11:42.480 --> 00:11:45.600
I would think that I would be struck down.

00:11:45.600 --> 00:11:48.399
Oh, that's dangerous.

00:11:49.200 --> 00:11:54.159
I would reject there is inhumane treatment of illegal immigrants in the United States under this administration.

00:11:54.159 --> 00:12:06.639
There was, however, uh significant inhumane treatment of illegal immigrants in the previous administration as they were being trafficked and raped and beaten, and in many cases killed over our United States southern border.

00:12:07.039 --> 00:12:10.000
Now let's say you're in a position where it's something similar.

00:12:10.000 --> 00:12:13.919
You work for an organization that is going against humanity.

00:12:13.919 --> 00:12:17.279
Statements that should be written should sound something more like this.

00:12:17.279 --> 00:12:24.559
We agree dignities matter, and we are reviewing enforcement practices to ensure proportionality and safety.

00:12:24.559 --> 00:12:29.200
You don't have to rewrite the entire immigration system to acknowledge humanity.

00:12:29.200 --> 00:12:43.519
You just have to show you heard the criticism and that the moral stakes means frustration that leverages this fear that you put into immigrants, that you're leveraging all of it for political gain to speak to your base.

00:12:43.519 --> 00:12:54.879
Okay, now let's take a hard turn because we're going to get back into the whole world of redemption and what it looks like when you have not earned it.

00:12:54.879 --> 00:13:01.039
Now, I recently read a profile in the Telegraph about Kevin Spacey.

00:13:01.039 --> 00:13:02.240
Remember him?

00:13:02.240 --> 00:13:14.159
And he is not the usual suspect when it comes to him and his crisis that is going to stick to him forever unless he acknowledges this.

00:13:14.159 --> 00:13:14.879
But you know what?

00:13:14.879 --> 00:13:16.960
I gotta tell you, I feel sorry for the guy.

00:13:16.960 --> 00:13:18.720
I still love him as an actor.

00:13:18.720 --> 00:13:26.799
I wish I could see him in things, but he can't be in anything when he still does and says the things that he says.

00:13:26.799 --> 00:13:28.399
So picture this.

00:13:28.399 --> 00:13:33.519
He is on stage in a Cyprus nightclub.

00:13:33.519 --> 00:13:39.440
The reporter, Mick Brown from the Telegraph, is interviewing him in person.

00:13:39.440 --> 00:13:42.399
Oh, how far the mighty have fallen.

00:13:42.399 --> 00:13:52.320
He is crooning songs like That's Life and Bridge Over Troubled Water to an audience paying up to 1,200 euros for the privilege.

00:13:52.320 --> 00:13:55.679
So the event is called Kevin Spacey Songs and Stories.

00:13:55.679 --> 00:14:06.240
There is a VIP meet and greet, and cocktail attire is required, but it promises a night of memories with one of the most iconic performers of our times.

00:14:06.240 --> 00:14:07.039
Wow.

00:14:07.039 --> 00:14:11.360
He is iconic, but not for being a performer, I don't think.

00:14:11.360 --> 00:14:19.440
So he's insisting that this is not a comeback tour, which makes sense because he does not think he deserved to be pushed out.

00:14:19.440 --> 00:14:20.799
So it's fascinating.

00:14:20.799 --> 00:14:23.519
I'm going to include a link to the article in the show notes.

00:14:23.519 --> 00:14:28.320
But the moment the piece gets into the past seven years, the narrative definitely shifts.

00:14:28.320 --> 00:14:40.000
He talks about the actor Anthony Rapp and the allegation that was made in 2017 and the immediate collapse of his career, the lawsuits, the cancellations, the trials.

00:14:40.000 --> 00:14:42.480
He reminds us that he was acquitted.

00:14:42.480 --> 00:14:49.519
Okay, and he reminds people in the story that he was acquitted in London and that a jury needed barely an hour to reject Rapp's claim.

00:14:49.519 --> 00:15:06.720
And then he pivots to the theme he clearly prefers, that there is a cloud over his life, that there is unfairness in the industry, and how Holly would abandon him, but regular people still stop him on the street with kindness, which I absolutely believe that is the case, that people do that.

00:15:06.720 --> 00:15:20.080
But the closest he gets to any introspection is the word reflection about how he was too secretive, about how he may have come across as a jerk and even asked himself why he played villains so well.

00:15:20.080 --> 00:15:28.000
And he calls this self-inquiry accountability, but he never touches what true accountability is.

00:15:28.000 --> 00:15:40.000
Not once does he address the pattern of allegations, not once does he confront the power dynamics that defined his career, and not once does he articulate what accountability would require from him beyond the suffering.

00:15:40.000 --> 00:15:42.960
Instead, his story is this familiar one.

00:15:42.960 --> 00:15:59.440
You know, he lost his house, he lost his money, he's bouncing between hotels and Airbnbs, and he's comparing himself to the blacklisted artists of the 50s during the Red Scare, as if the public, you know, simply misunderstood him.

00:15:59.440 --> 00:16:09.120
That was a completely different time and a completely different misunderstanding because what he did and what he's accused of is not a misunderstanding.

00:16:09.120 --> 00:16:14.320
So he's still casting himself as misunderstood, mistreated, and ready for redemption.

00:16:14.320 --> 00:16:25.840
And he is trying so hard, but it's not the same as narrative rehabilitation because the hardship that he's dealing with is not the same as taking responsibility for it.

00:16:25.840 --> 00:16:34.240
Spacey is doing the kind of emotional storytelling people often reach for when they want sympathy to stand in for accountability.

00:16:34.240 --> 00:16:40.320
And the problem is that accountability requires more moral inventory, not a career retrospective.

00:16:40.320 --> 00:16:42.960
And he still hasn't done that inventory.

00:16:42.960 --> 00:16:54.000
So Kevin Spacey and anyone else, if you are working with someone, whether it's in entertainment or any other sector where they're just not getting it.

00:16:54.000 --> 00:16:56.320
Suffering is not accountability.

00:16:56.320 --> 00:17:07.039
You do not get a bypass for the hard part and earn your way back with nostalgia or swooning or VIP packages.

00:17:07.039 --> 00:17:08.799
Oh, Kevin.

00:17:08.799 --> 00:17:10.720
Oh, Kevin.

00:17:10.720 --> 00:17:17.440
Lastly, let's pivot to something slightly different, but it's still about accountability, kind of sort of.

00:17:17.440 --> 00:17:19.200
It's slightly different.

00:17:19.200 --> 00:17:21.359
It's still about accountability, kind of sorta.

00:17:21.359 --> 00:17:26.079
But I just have to mention it because of the timing of this article, because it's a big article.

00:17:26.079 --> 00:17:29.279
It's the Harper's Bizarre Moment for Megan Markle.

00:17:29.279 --> 00:17:30.960
They ran a big profile of her.

00:17:30.960 --> 00:17:32.880
She has a special coming out in Netflix.

00:17:32.880 --> 00:17:35.119
Perhaps you've seen some of the promos.

00:17:35.119 --> 00:17:38.559
It's Meghan Markle during the holiday season.

00:17:38.559 --> 00:17:41.519
There's one part of the article that just jumped out.

00:17:41.519 --> 00:17:44.640
I'm neither a fan nor a hater of Meghan Markle.

00:17:44.640 --> 00:17:46.240
I fall right down the middle with her.

00:17:46.240 --> 00:17:47.599
I have empathy for her.

00:17:47.599 --> 00:17:56.160
I have sympathy for her with what she managed in the royal family, but I think she made so many mistakes, and I have been saying this for years about her.

00:17:56.160 --> 00:17:59.599
I usually chronicle them in posts and podcasts.

00:17:59.599 --> 00:18:02.640
I'm neither a fan nor a hater of Megan Markle.

00:18:02.640 --> 00:18:04.319
I fall right down the middle with her.

00:18:04.319 --> 00:18:05.680
I have empathy for her.

00:18:05.680 --> 00:18:14.079
I have sympathy for her with what she managed in the royal family, but I think she made so many mistakes, and I have been saying this for years about her.

00:18:14.079 --> 00:18:17.039
It's like every move she makes is the wrong move.

00:18:17.039 --> 00:18:27.519
I think she's now slowly getting into the place where she needed to get into influencing, into products and styling and the whole world that she's in right now.

00:18:27.519 --> 00:18:32.960
And I think all the stuff she's doing on Netflix, even though I find it incredibly boring, I still think it's cool.

00:18:32.960 --> 00:18:34.160
You know, I like it.

00:18:34.160 --> 00:18:36.559
But her persona is still so off.

00:18:36.559 --> 00:18:37.279
It is so off.

00:18:37.279 --> 00:18:42.880
And when you read this article in Harper's Bazaar, it really comes out because there is this truly bizarre piece of the article.

00:18:42.880 --> 00:18:47.680
And I'm not even going to bore you with all of it, but again, it's kind of the same narrative about Megan growing up.

00:18:47.680 --> 00:18:58.480
But there is this moment where the second half of the interview, she's in New York City and she arrives at a grand Upper East State brownstone, owned by one of Megan's friends, which friend we do not know.

00:18:58.480 --> 00:19:03.759
But a house manager announces her as she arrives.

00:19:03.759 --> 00:19:13.680
Megan, Duchess of Sussex, and the reporter doesn't miss a trick, writes it in the article that they're the only two people in the house.

00:19:13.680 --> 00:19:16.400
So they announce it to no one.

00:19:16.400 --> 00:19:22.160
It's things like that, just no.

00:19:22.160 --> 00:19:23.920
And she's in the swanky.

00:19:23.920 --> 00:19:28.640
So Megan wants to be so relatable, but she's living in a very unrelatable world.

00:19:28.640 --> 00:19:32.079
But there's a lot of people who look at her and say, But do you deserve this world?

00:19:32.079 --> 00:19:33.279
Like, what are you?

00:19:33.279 --> 00:19:38.799
But she's still living in this kind of hierarchy world and she's struggling with identity and placement.

00:19:38.799 --> 00:19:40.799
She just doesn't know where to go.

00:19:40.799 --> 00:19:49.200
So she still hasn't really had her accountability moment where she really comes clean and says, Oh my gosh, you know what?

00:19:49.200 --> 00:19:51.200
This has been a messy path for us.

00:19:51.200 --> 00:19:53.680
And there are a lot of things we would have done differently.

00:19:53.680 --> 00:19:55.039
But she can't do that.

00:19:55.039 --> 00:19:59.440
She's always going to stick to this kind of higher royal pedigree.

00:19:59.440 --> 00:20:08.799
The whole article, as well, tries to label her as this incredibly authentic person and interviews other people who all say she's authentic, but she truly isn't.

00:20:08.799 --> 00:20:09.839
That's her problem.

00:20:09.839 --> 00:20:11.839
That's the problem with Megan Markle.

00:20:11.839 --> 00:20:13.039
She's not authentic.

00:20:13.039 --> 00:20:15.839
If she were, I think she'd be fantastic.

00:20:15.839 --> 00:20:22.559
But she just can't let go of that because I think she thinks it's their calling card and it's how they're going to pay the bills.

00:20:22.559 --> 00:20:23.200
All right.

00:20:23.200 --> 00:20:27.440
So that wraps up this episode of the podcast.

00:20:27.440 --> 00:20:30.079
You can join me typically every Friday.

00:20:30.079 --> 00:20:31.599
I hop on Substack.

00:20:31.599 --> 00:20:32.720
I do a live chat.

00:20:32.720 --> 00:20:33.759
It's open to anyone.

00:20:33.759 --> 00:20:35.119
You can just follow the link.

00:20:35.119 --> 00:20:38.319
I send out a weekly email that always comes with that link.

00:20:38.319 --> 00:20:41.680
If you want to sign up for that, I have a link in the show notes for you to sign up.

00:20:41.680 --> 00:20:43.359
But head on over to Substack.

00:20:43.359 --> 00:20:44.480
Bring your own examples.

00:20:44.480 --> 00:20:56.880
If it's a statement, apology, or a meltdown that caught your attention, go ahead and throw it in the chat and we will all dissect it together, figure out what worked, what fizzled, and what a smarter move would have looked like.

00:20:56.880 --> 00:20:58.799
So I hope you can join me there.

00:20:58.799 --> 00:21:10.079
If you want to be a member, we have our members-only monthly trainings as well as our members-only vault sessions, where everything that is said in the vault stays in the vault.

00:21:10.079 --> 00:21:14.640
And I will tell you, on December 17th, I am bringing back Dr.

00:21:14.640 --> 00:21:15.839
Abby Medcalf.

00:21:15.839 --> 00:21:29.759
And we are going to do a breakdown on Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, Justin Baldone, because it is one year, it's a year ago, December, where Blake Lively filed that civil complaint against Justin Baldone.

00:21:29.759 --> 00:21:31.680
We are going to break it all down.

00:21:31.680 --> 00:21:34.000
This is for members of my Substack.

00:21:34.000 --> 00:21:37.680
You can find out more information in the show notes.

00:21:37.680 --> 00:21:38.880
That's all for this week.

00:21:38.880 --> 00:21:40.400
Thanks so much for listening.

00:21:40.400 --> 00:21:41.759
Bye for now.