July 30, 2025
Why Gwyneth’s Viral Ad Won’t Save Astronomer
After NPR called me to weigh in on the Coldplay concert scandal and Astronomer’s new viral ad starring Gwyneth Paltrow, a listener to the time to email to call me a “fussbucket.”
You know what? I’ll take it.
Because here’s the thing: clever marketing isn’t a substitute for accountability. In this epsiode ofThe PR Breakdown, I explain why Astronomer’s ad (produced by Ryan Reynolds’ Maximum Effort and fronted by Gwyneth Paltrow) is a classic case of PR deflection wrapped in celebrity glitter.
This episode unpacks:
- Why the real problem was never the kiss—it was the CEO-HR power dynamic
- The danger of turning ethical breaches into punchlines
- How Maximum Effort’s fastvertising campaign misread the assignment
- What leadership accountability actually sounds like (hint: not “we’ve become a household name”)
Want to learn what separates a temporary distraction from a lasting reputation hit? This episode is for you.
Mentioned in the episode:
- "5 PR Lessons from the Coldplay Concert That Took Down a CEO" - Molly McPherson, Substack (July, 23, 2025)
- "The Coldplay Concert Scandal That Took Down a CEO" - PR Breakdown podcast (July 23, 2025)
Want More Behind the Breakdown?
Follow The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson on Substack for early access to podcast episodes, exclusive member chats, weekly lives, and monthly workshops that go deeper than the mic. It's the insider’s hub for communicators who want strategy with spine—and a little side-eye where it counts.
Follow Molly → @MollyMcPherson
Subscribe to PR Breakdown on Substack → prbreakdown.media
Need a Keynote Speaker? Drawing from real-world PR battles, Molly delivers the same engaging stories and hard-won crisis insights from the podcast to your live audience. Click here to book Molly for your next meeting.
This podcast is supported by Muck Rack, the PR management platform I use to monitor media coverage, track journalist activity, and inform high-stakes strategy with real-time data. Click here to try Muck Rack for yourself.
Follow & Connect with Molly:
00:00 - Gwyneth Enters the Astronomer Crisis
01:40 - The Viral Ad and PR Deflection
04:38 - Questioning the Crisis Management Strategy
05:54 - Maximum Effort's Fast-vertising Playbook
10:49 - When PR Deflection Works and Fails
15:40 - Leadership Lessons from Astronomer's Approach
20:26 - Closing Thoughts on Crisis Strategy
WEBVTT
00:00:00.480 --> 00:00:14.574
In a totally unexpected twist to the Coldplay Kiss Cam scandal, gwyneth Paltrow has now entered the chat Astronomer hiring Ryan Reynolds' company Maximum Effort to create an ad that would capitalize on the newfound interest in the company.
00:00:14.574 --> 00:00:30.190
You may have seen the viral ad from Astroner Gwyneth Paltrow, poised and polished, calmly explaining Apache Airflow orchestration while carefully avoiding any mention of the scandal that recently thrust the company into public view.
00:00:30.190 --> 00:00:35.524
Her delivery Cool, very goopy, the tone Witty.
00:00:35.524 --> 00:00:39.390
The strategy Pure PR deflection.
00:00:39.390 --> 00:00:40.792
Did it work?
00:00:40.792 --> 00:00:42.854
Depends.
00:00:42.854 --> 00:00:46.408
Welcome to the PR Breakdown.
00:00:46.740 --> 00:01:02.926
I'm your host, molly McPherson, and in this episode let's discuss how brands and celebrities try to rewrite their reputations using humor, other celebrities and distraction, and why that's becoming a trend and not a really good one.
00:01:02.926 --> 00:01:04.305
Let's get into it.
00:01:04.305 --> 00:01:09.302
From crisis to ad campaign, let's set this up.
00:01:09.302 --> 00:01:12.790
I do not want to linger on the Coldplay concert.
00:01:12.790 --> 00:01:14.153
That was two weeks ago.
00:01:14.153 --> 00:01:29.847
We've all seen it, we've all talked about it Two executives, a kiss cam, chris Martin, and an internet pile-on the former CEO of Astronomer, andy Byron, and Human Resources Executive, kristen Cabot.
00:01:29.968 --> 00:01:31.834
Both have resigned.
00:01:31.834 --> 00:01:37.513
I have the word resigned in air quotes if you could see me with my fingers in the air.
00:01:37.513 --> 00:01:54.950
The story made headlines everywhere, but that's now secondary to what everyone is talking about this week, but that's now secondary to what everyone is talking about this week, the eh, or as I call it, the stunt and if you agree with me or not, I think we can both agree that we can call it the strategy.
00:01:54.950 --> 00:02:07.697
Enter Gwyneth Paltrow's now viral appearance as Astronomer's temporary spokesperson that's in air quotes as well was cheeky high gloss and it was PR engineered.
00:02:14.500 --> 00:02:14.920
She answered.
00:02:14.920 --> 00:02:15.102
Well.
00:02:15.102 --> 00:02:16.044
Okay, just take a listen.
00:02:16.044 --> 00:02:19.491
Astronomer has gotten a lot of questions over the last few days and they wanted me to answer the most common ones.
00:02:19.491 --> 00:02:22.704
Yes, astronomer is the best place to run Apache Airflow.
00:02:22.704 --> 00:02:24.527
There is still room available.
00:02:24.527 --> 00:02:32.248
At our Beyond Analytics event in September, we will now be returning to what we do best delivering game-changing results for our customers.
00:02:32.248 --> 00:02:35.088
Thank you for your interest in Astronomer.
00:02:35.862 --> 00:02:36.649
Important to note.
00:02:36.649 --> 00:02:41.069
She never once referenced the actual issue that landed the company in hot water.
00:02:41.069 --> 00:02:43.883
Not that we expected her to, but that omission.
00:02:43.883 --> 00:02:45.266
What's the point?
00:02:45.266 --> 00:02:47.600
The ad reframed the moment.
00:02:47.600 --> 00:02:50.948
It repackaged a scandal into a clever marketing bump.
00:02:50.948 --> 00:02:52.290
But here's the truth.
00:02:52.290 --> 00:02:55.163
That ad was entirely unnecessary.
00:02:55.163 --> 00:03:02.646
If Astronomer had addressed the issue early with integrity and transparency, this kind of media spin wouldn't have been needed.
00:03:03.307 --> 00:03:07.741
For reference, last week's podcast episode I have a link in the show notes.
00:03:07.741 --> 00:03:21.114
I discuss exactly why the entire viral mishegas happened, and it's because they made a massive misstep by not addressing that fake CEO statement.
00:03:21.114 --> 00:03:22.923
That's what triggered the algorithm.
00:03:22.923 --> 00:03:24.906
That's why everybody was talking about it.
00:03:24.906 --> 00:03:30.215
There's also a number of social media posts of mine in TikTok, instagram, linkedin and Substack.
00:03:30.215 --> 00:03:36.822
You can check those out in the show notes as well.
00:03:36.842 --> 00:03:38.183
Now here's something that I haven't said yet about this matter.
00:03:38.183 --> 00:03:41.370
We have two 50-somethings getting together, married or not.
00:03:41.370 --> 00:03:50.344
I still don't think it's newsworthy that a CEO and the chief people officer maybe, maybe not had an affair.
00:03:50.344 --> 00:04:00.110
That duck and cover at a Coldplay concert yeah, that's what made it newsworthy viral newsworthy, but it's still private.
00:04:00.110 --> 00:04:03.463
Chris Martin outing someone who looked like they're having an affair.
00:04:03.463 --> 00:04:08.525
Viral For public consumption, definitely, but what's going on with the two of them?
00:04:08.525 --> 00:04:09.789
Not necessarily.
00:04:09.789 --> 00:04:15.092
No one knows the status of Andy Byron and Kristen Cabot's relationship.
00:04:15.092 --> 00:04:20.598
Yes, according to press reports, they were both quote-unquote married, but were they separated from their spouses?
00:04:20.598 --> 00:04:24.071
It's possible that one or both have already filed for divorce.
00:04:24.071 --> 00:04:26.605
This could have been a celebratory date.
00:04:26.605 --> 00:04:34.507
We may learn the truth later down the road, but it won't matter, because their names are now forever associated with their story.
00:04:34.507 --> 00:04:38.283
Their names are mud, and here's the bottom line up front.
00:04:38.283 --> 00:04:43.093
I'm just not digging astronomers' crisis management strategy at all.
00:04:43.093 --> 00:04:48.064
Is there a problem with the CEO getting together with his chief people officer?
00:04:48.064 --> 00:04:50.288
Yeah, that's huge.
00:04:50.288 --> 00:05:08.264
On my girls weekend last week and if you saw my social media posts, you saw me talk about it we chit-chatted a lot about this and if you were following any of my lives on Substack, you know that I got really close to the inner circle, so I definitely know things that are not public.
00:05:08.264 --> 00:05:25.490
We had a very spirited conversation about this, but the one thing we all agree on is this when you have the CEO and the head of HR together in a relationship and it's a hidden relationship that creates a whole lot of problems for the company because anyone who was let go or reprimanded by Chris and Cabot.
00:05:25.490 --> 00:05:31.800
They now have a legal standing against Astronomer for a false firing or a false reprimand, whatever it is.
00:05:31.800 --> 00:05:35.149
So those two getting together absolutely caused a problem.
00:05:35.149 --> 00:05:41.031
That's the crisis, not the fact that two people who worked together came together and were outed by Chris Martin.
00:05:41.031 --> 00:05:41.742
That's not the issue.
00:05:41.742 --> 00:05:43.651
The crisis is that a CEO and a chief people officer were outed by Chris Martin.
00:05:43.651 --> 00:05:44.213
That's not the issue.
00:05:44.213 --> 00:05:46.600
The crisis is that a CEO and a chief people officer were outed.
00:05:46.600 --> 00:05:47.723
That's the problem.
00:05:48.384 --> 00:05:54.435
Now let's move on to astronomers using humor as a shield.
00:05:54.435 --> 00:05:58.733
That ad, maximum Effort, the agency behind the ad.
00:05:58.733 --> 00:06:03.166
And, by the way, I just finished an interview with NPR for All Things Considered that aired on Monday.
00:06:03.166 --> 00:06:05.773
I flubbed maximum effort.
00:06:05.773 --> 00:06:12.233
I cannot tell you how much I struggled saying it and now it flows effortlessly out of my mouth.
00:06:12.701 --> 00:06:23.375
But it is more than a punchline factory, because it was co-founded by friend of the podcast not really Ryan Reynolds and a former president of a digital marketing company.
00:06:23.375 --> 00:06:29.247
But their company has built a reputation for this rapid response, culturally timed campaigns.
00:06:29.247 --> 00:06:35.084
So its name is a nod to Ryan Reynolds' character in Deadpool.
00:06:35.084 --> 00:06:36.447
So the strategy of the company?
00:06:36.447 --> 00:06:38.490
It's called fast-fertizing.
00:06:38.490 --> 00:06:42.307
They call it agile production that mirrors the pace of social media.
00:06:42.307 --> 00:06:46.749
I'm not a fan of Ryan Reynolds but I'll give him credit for this concept.
00:06:46.749 --> 00:06:56.494
Now a lot of other companies have the same concept but because it's Ryan Reynolds, tied into his Hollywood persona, his fame along with his wife's fame.
00:06:57.000 --> 00:06:59.002
You remember he had Aviation Gin.
00:06:59.002 --> 00:07:01.047
He made big money off of that.
00:07:01.047 --> 00:07:03.329
That company did the ad campaign.
00:07:03.329 --> 00:07:05.954
They did a Peloton parody on Matchcom.
00:07:05.954 --> 00:07:11.127
They also did the response to Chris Noth.
00:07:11.127 --> 00:07:19.879
Remember in Just Like that, the TV show, the spinoff from Sex and the City, when Chris Noth had a heart attack on the Peloton?
00:07:19.879 --> 00:07:23.889
Sorry if I'm spoiling that for you, which, by the way, it's just coming to my mind right now.
00:07:23.889 --> 00:07:25.312
I think I did.
00:07:25.312 --> 00:07:35.370
I met the person who worked for the agency that handled the Peloton when that whole thing happened and no one had any idea that that was coming down the pike.
00:07:35.822 --> 00:07:37.367
So, maximum effort.
00:07:37.367 --> 00:07:40.370
They're the ones who could quickly turn things around.
00:07:40.370 --> 00:07:42.007
It's a successful company.
00:07:42.007 --> 00:07:44.028
We will give that to Ryan Reynolds.
00:07:44.028 --> 00:07:45.720
So this Gwyneth fits the playbook.
00:07:45.720 --> 00:07:45.807
It's a successful company.
00:07:45.807 --> 00:07:46.028
We will give that to Ryan Reynolds.
00:07:46.028 --> 00:07:46.548
So this Gwyneth fits the playbook.
00:07:46.548 --> 00:07:48.271
It's swiftly produced.
00:07:48.271 --> 00:07:50.452
Tone, perfect time, just right.
00:07:50.793 --> 00:07:54.624
People liked it and I talked about it in a social media post.
00:07:54.624 --> 00:07:59.083
As I mentioned, my girlfriends and I were talking about it on our girls weekend to the vineyard.
00:07:59.083 --> 00:08:01.286
We all agreed Great ad.
00:08:01.286 --> 00:08:08.245
It definitely hit a note and, from the comments on my social media, most people liked it.
00:08:08.245 --> 00:08:14.086
I still stand by it, though it was not the right response for what Astronomer was dealing with.
00:08:14.086 --> 00:08:17.372
So the ad was well produced and what Gwyneth was doing fine.
00:08:17.939 --> 00:08:23.413
But it was pure PR deflection Because, first of all, as I said, none of it was necessary.
00:08:23.413 --> 00:08:25.908
Remember what I said in the beginning none of it was necessary.
00:08:25.908 --> 00:08:27.314
Remember what I said in the beginning none of it was necessary.
00:08:27.314 --> 00:08:28.016
We didn't even have to do that.
00:08:28.016 --> 00:08:33.530
Had astronomer managed the internal problem quietly, transparently, with leadership, the deflection wouldn't have been needed.
00:08:33.530 --> 00:08:37.206
But don't forget, that's the reason why we had this ad in the first place.
00:08:37.768 --> 00:08:40.581
Instead we did get a campaign that was funny.
00:08:40.581 --> 00:08:44.111
I didn't think it was that funny, but I was not amused by it.
00:08:44.111 --> 00:08:46.157
But I'll still call it funny if.
00:08:46.157 --> 00:08:50.528
But it left all the accountability on the cutting room floor.
00:08:50.528 --> 00:08:51.611
So I get it.
00:08:51.611 --> 00:08:52.923
The public's amused by it.
00:08:52.923 --> 00:08:56.211
They're not outraged, they're not skeptical, they're just amused.
00:08:56.211 --> 00:09:00.451
So some people could say, hey, that's a win-win.
00:09:00.451 --> 00:09:12.313
But for the people in my comments who said they didn't like it because it was a PR deflection and it wasn't working for them, brava, there is no shame to the people who liked it because it was designed to make you like it.
00:09:12.313 --> 00:09:17.192
But for my PR types I'm glad that you could see right through it.
00:09:17.919 --> 00:09:18.562
Why Gwyneth?
00:09:18.562 --> 00:09:19.186
Why now?
00:09:19.186 --> 00:09:24.183
Well, there's timing here worth noting Amy O'Dell's biography Gwyneth.
00:09:24.183 --> 00:09:36.143
The biography dropped yesterday, july 29th, a deeply reported, possibly unflattering look at Paltrow's life, from the 90s Hollywood all the way to Goop.
00:09:36.143 --> 00:09:40.392
Gwyneth Paltrow whether you like her or not, she's polarizing.
00:09:40.392 --> 00:09:45.230
She's just one of those celebrities that is not universally well-liked.
00:09:45.230 --> 00:09:50.046
For every person that likes her, I would argue there's like a handful of people who don't like her.
00:09:50.046 --> 00:09:54.413
We've already seen some of the leaks from the book come out already.
00:09:54.413 --> 00:10:07.346
It doesn't mean that Gwyneth Paltrow is going to have a massive negative backlash with this book, but it's going to remind people of why they don't like Gwyneth Paltrow, because there's just other stories there.
00:10:07.346 --> 00:10:14.082
So there is no doubt in my mind that Gwyneth Paltrow doing this ad it's a reminder that she's in on the joke.
00:10:14.123 --> 00:10:21.187
Before the press cycle spins back up, the conscious uncoupled Chris Martin, her ex-husband.
00:10:21.187 --> 00:10:23.730
He has Martin and Coldplay by far their streams.
00:10:23.730 --> 00:10:39.288
Everything has been roses for Coldplay and Chris Martin.
00:10:39.288 --> 00:10:41.392
But Gwyneth she's polarizing.
00:10:41.392 --> 00:10:44.143
It could help her, but it's also going to hurt her.
00:10:44.143 --> 00:10:48.753
Either way, she did control the narrative and that's not nothing.
00:10:49.159 --> 00:10:51.703
But does PR deflection work In the short term?
00:10:51.703 --> 00:10:58.615
Yes, as I mentioned, based on my social media comments, people found the ad amusing, but amusing doesn't equal absolution.
00:10:58.615 --> 00:11:02.644
Let's just compare a couple examples.
00:11:02.644 --> 00:11:07.625
A few years ago, kfc UK came out with a campaign that was on Twitter Not X, but it was Twitter.
00:11:07.625 --> 00:11:11.309
They decided to deflect that crisis with humor.
00:11:11.309 --> 00:11:16.664
They called their campaign a quote FCK end quote bucket campaign.
00:11:16.664 --> 00:11:21.073
I have a link to the tweet in the show notes.
00:11:21.073 --> 00:11:22.697
That worked.
00:11:22.697 --> 00:11:26.607
They got great press from that PR deflection.
00:11:26.607 --> 00:11:29.452
That is when PR deflection works.
00:11:29.452 --> 00:11:32.840
Another example that is when PR deflection works.
00:11:32.840 --> 00:11:39.345
Another example Barack Obama with the birth certificate controversy.
00:11:39.345 --> 00:11:45.200
In 2011, at a White House correspondence dinner, obama addressed the conspiracy theories about his birthplace by revealing a clip from Disney's the Lion King.
00:11:45.200 --> 00:11:50.924
Tonight, for the first time, I am releasing my official birth video.
00:11:50.924 --> 00:12:05.836
Oh well, back to square one.
00:12:05.836 --> 00:12:19.028
That was a humorous turn and an event that really worships at the altar of humor from politicians Also George W Bush another case of self-deprecation.
00:12:19.048 --> 00:12:26.495
Bush often pokes fun at his own verbal gaffes, like mispronunciations, like placing emphasis on the wrong syllable.
00:12:26.495 --> 00:12:30.946
These types of jokes divert attention from criticisms about his intellect.
00:12:30.946 --> 00:12:37.480
That's a PR crisis for Bush, his intellect being secondary in his presidential campaign.
00:12:37.480 --> 00:12:45.567
But when he makes fun of himself, he makes himself appear more approachable by diffusing the harsher attacks and people like that.
00:12:45.567 --> 00:12:49.330
But astronomers issue it's a CEO involved with the head of HR.
00:12:49.330 --> 00:12:54.945
That's a power imbalance that brings up ethical questions, potential legal implications.
00:12:54.945 --> 00:12:57.851
That's not something you joke your way out of.
00:12:57.971 --> 00:13:01.147
And no, there's no way that this ad is going to increase sales.
00:13:01.147 --> 00:13:02.831
Will it increase impressions?
00:13:02.831 --> 00:13:05.864
Will it increase name recognition?
00:13:05.864 --> 00:13:06.846
Absolutely?
00:13:06.846 --> 00:13:15.783
I was asked on the All Things Considered NPR interview wouldn't you agree that everyone that no one was familiar with Astronomer?
00:13:15.783 --> 00:13:16.525
And now everyone is?
00:13:16.525 --> 00:13:26.565
Absolutely, and maybe it might get more people to show up at their Beyond Analytics event in September that Gwyneth Paltrow pushed in the ad.
00:13:26.565 --> 00:13:30.000
But long-term credibility, that's a different conversation.
00:13:30.570 --> 00:13:33.961
Take new data from my new podcast partner, muckrack.
00:13:33.961 --> 00:13:42.065
They have a study that shows that 27% of all citations across AI models are from journalistic content.
00:13:42.065 --> 00:13:46.581
That number climbs to 30% when looking at links that AI tools actively cite.
00:13:46.581 --> 00:13:51.336
When we think of press mentions, it's not just the internet anymore, it's also AI.
00:13:51.336 --> 00:14:02.717
So when you're plugging into Perplexity or ChatGPT or even MuckRack, you work in PR and you want background information on this story about astronomer, it's going to skim stories from AI.
00:14:02.717 --> 00:14:08.941
So, yes, the impressions will definitely be there, but does that equal Sam's?
00:14:10.083 --> 00:14:11.668
So what is being deflected here?
00:14:11.668 --> 00:14:21.214
A CEO involved with a person responsible for hiring and firing A board that supported both, and a company trying to move on without offering accountability.
00:14:21.214 --> 00:14:24.418
And now a celebrity spokesperson is trying to smooth things over.
00:14:24.418 --> 00:14:32.765
Anyone who's ever been reprimanded by Chris and Cabot has every right to question that outcome now, and they might even do it legally.
00:14:32.765 --> 00:14:41.051
Here's another reason why I think Astronomer's crisis PR strategy from the beginning was wrong, and that's the interim CEO, pete DeJoy.
00:14:41.051 --> 00:14:48.116
Now he stepped in as the interim CEO from Andy Byron, but Pete DeJoy was a co-founder.
00:14:48.697 --> 00:15:04.038
Here's an excerpt from a statement that he posted on July 21st into helping build, and then he goes on to talk about what happened with the company over the past few years.
00:15:04.038 --> 00:15:23.120
Then he says the events of the past few days have received a level of media attention that few companies, let alone startups, in our small corner of the data and AI world ever encounter the spotlight has been unusual and surreal for our team, and, while I would never have wished for it to happen like this, astronomer is now a household name.
00:15:23.120 --> 00:15:26.253
At Astronomer, we have never shied away from challenges.
00:15:26.253 --> 00:15:31.274
A near decade of building this business has tested us time and time again and each time we've emerged stronger.
00:15:31.274 --> 00:15:33.480
A couple things to point out in there.
00:15:33.480 --> 00:15:35.231
Astronomer has been around for 10 years.
00:15:35.231 --> 00:15:38.399
Did you know about Astronomer before 10 days ago?
00:15:38.399 --> 00:15:46.917
No, the fact that they're mentioning the event of the past few days receiving a level of media attention that few companies, let alone startups, ever have.
00:15:46.917 --> 00:15:51.674
Next, mentioning that astronomer is now a household name.
00:15:51.674 --> 00:16:01.037
I think there is a level of Pete DeJoy taking joy out of what's happening with the company In this statement.
00:16:01.317 --> 00:16:09.297
There is nothing about what happened there, the breakdown that happened there, the ethical breakdown that happened there.
00:16:09.297 --> 00:16:13.639
They're trying to gloss over it and it's something that can't be forgotten.
00:16:13.639 --> 00:16:16.571
The statement said astronomer is now a household name.
00:16:16.571 --> 00:16:31.432
True, but now, for the reasons a CEO or an interim CEO should want, I had to look at his background because I work with a lot of CEOs in crisis and I can usually tell right off the bat what their background is, and I nailed it on this one.
00:16:31.493 --> 00:16:36.913
I thought, as soon as I look up this guy, I know the background is going to be from one side of the brain.
00:16:36.913 --> 00:16:38.878
He went to Bowdoin great school.
00:16:38.878 --> 00:16:41.892
He has degrees in chemistry and physics.
00:16:41.892 --> 00:16:48.899
That makes him a great person for chemistry and physics and for starting a company 10 years ago.
00:16:48.899 --> 00:16:54.735
He's clearly brilliant, but that doesn't necessarily make him the right person to manage reputation.
00:16:54.735 --> 00:16:58.662
Pr isn't about IQ, it's about EQ.
00:16:58.662 --> 00:17:01.153
It's about understanding culture.
00:17:01.153 --> 00:17:02.998
It's about understanding reputation.
00:17:03.398 --> 00:17:23.587
And he may not have written the entire playbook about hiring maximum effort, about hiring Gwyneth Paltrow, about not putting out any type of release to quash the fake CEO posts that went out there, but if he did or not, he certainly approved it or someone on the board did, and it shows this was a misstep from the beginning.
00:17:23.587 --> 00:17:27.442
They were using just logic where leadership required empathy.
00:17:27.442 --> 00:17:35.573
Yes, it's true, everyone has heard about Astronomer, but would you invest in a company whose crisis plan rests on Ryan Reynolds and a punchline?
00:17:35.573 --> 00:17:36.596
I wouldn't.
00:17:36.596 --> 00:17:39.125
Oh, you think I forgot to mention Ryan Reynolds?
00:17:39.125 --> 00:17:41.413
This is a podcast about PR deflection.
00:17:41.413 --> 00:17:43.760
Why wouldn't I mention Ryan Reynolds?
00:17:44.309 --> 00:17:51.551
Because Maximum Effort made maximum effort to make sure that everyone knew that they were behind this viral ad.
00:17:51.551 --> 00:17:57.211
I found it on X because I was following breadcrumbs and when I landed there, I noticed one.
00:17:57.211 --> 00:18:01.521
I haven't spent any time on X because I have so many notifications on X.
00:18:01.521 --> 00:18:08.714
So many people have been trying to reach me on X, but this is where I saw their post and I posted this to Instagram and TikTok and Substack as well.
00:18:08.714 --> 00:18:14.693
This is what it said Thank you for your interest in maximum effort at Astro Mario.
00:18:14.693 --> 00:18:17.759
That's the X account for astronomer.
00:18:17.759 --> 00:18:24.800
We'll now get back to what we do best Motion pictures with Hugh Jackman, faster vising and Wrexham football.
00:18:24.800 --> 00:18:31.000
So all these plugs, everything that's Ryan Reynolds affiliated, we'll leave data workflow automation too.
00:18:31.000 --> 00:18:35.978
And then they strike out Gwyneth Pall you know PA astronomer.
00:18:35.978 --> 00:18:38.018
And then it's a link to the ad.
00:18:38.210 --> 00:18:40.880
That is classic Ryan Reynolds wit.
00:18:40.880 --> 00:18:44.474
He inserted himself in the story because why wouldn't he?
00:18:44.474 --> 00:18:57.911
Because he's a part of a massive PR crisis, and that is the it Ends With Us PR crisis that his wife, blake Lively, is stuck in the middle of along with him, and I think it's all because of Ryan Reynolds in the first place.
00:18:57.911 --> 00:19:00.336
And that thing goes on and on.
00:19:00.336 --> 00:19:02.521
A lot of people have not forgotten about it.
00:19:02.521 --> 00:19:09.997
He does want people to forget about it, but he wants the internet to forget about it as well, because these things still have a way of pushing down other stories.
00:19:10.569 --> 00:19:16.598
This kind of quippy humor is very Ryan Reynolds, very Gwyneth Paltrow, and that's why they both did it.
00:19:16.598 --> 00:19:17.951
So in the short term, does it work?
00:19:17.951 --> 00:19:19.311
Sure, I get it.
00:19:19.311 --> 00:19:21.313
I'm not gonna shame anyone who thinks it's great.
00:19:21.313 --> 00:19:23.013
I'm with you, I get it.
00:19:23.013 --> 00:19:31.780
But for my PR types, the people in the comments who kind of can see through the efforts here and what they're doing that's what I pay attention to.
00:19:32.421 --> 00:19:35.923
So what this means for leaders watching this whole thing play out.
00:19:35.923 --> 00:19:41.646
One humor can soften a blow, but it won't rebuild trust.
00:19:41.646 --> 00:19:49.672
Two, faster advising works until it doesn't.
00:19:49.672 --> 00:19:52.155
It's fast, it comes on fast, but it goes away just as fast.
00:19:52.155 --> 00:19:57.265
Faster vising works, but it goes away as easy as it comes.
00:19:57.265 --> 00:20:02.277
And three, when public trust erodes, clever isn't enough.
00:20:02.277 --> 00:20:13.076
So if you're a leader in a crisis or you are counseling leadership in a crisis, the public does not want entertainment, they want truth, they want responsibility.
00:20:13.630 --> 00:20:21.269
So for anyone who works in strategy or has the ear of someone in strategy, use this story as a case study.
00:00:00.480 --> 00:00:14.574
00:00:14.574 --> 00:00:30.190
00:00:30.190 --> 00:00:35.524
00:00:35.524 --> 00:00:39.390
00:00:39.390 --> 00:00:40.792
00:00:40.792 --> 00:00:42.854
00:00:42.854 --> 00:00:46.408
00:00:46.740 --> 00:01:02.926
00:01:02.926 --> 00:01:04.305
00:01:04.305 --> 00:01:09.302
00:01:09.302 --> 00:01:12.790
00:01:12.790 --> 00:01:14.153
00:01:14.153 --> 00:01:29.847
00:01:29.968 --> 00:01:31.834
00:01:31.834 --> 00:01:37.513
00:01:37.513 --> 00:01:54.950
00:01:54.950 --> 00:02:07.697
00:02:14.500 --> 00:02:14.920
00:02:14.920 --> 00:02:15.102
00:02:15.102 --> 00:02:16.044
00:02:16.044 --> 00:02:19.491
00:02:19.491 --> 00:02:22.704
00:02:22.704 --> 00:02:24.527
00:02:24.527 --> 00:02:32.248
00:02:32.248 --> 00:02:35.088
00:02:35.862 --> 00:02:36.649
00:02:36.649 --> 00:02:41.069
00:02:41.069 --> 00:02:43.883
00:02:43.883 --> 00:02:45.266
00:02:45.266 --> 00:02:47.600
00:02:47.600 --> 00:02:50.948
00:02:50.948 --> 00:02:52.290
00:02:52.290 --> 00:02:55.163
00:02:55.163 --> 00:03:02.646
00:03:03.307 --> 00:03:07.741
00:03:07.741 --> 00:03:21.114
00:03:21.114 --> 00:03:22.923
00:03:22.923 --> 00:03:24.906
00:03:24.906 --> 00:03:30.215
00:03:30.215 --> 00:03:36.822
00:03:36.842 --> 00:03:38.183
00:03:38.183 --> 00:03:41.370
00:03:41.370 --> 00:03:50.344
00:03:50.344 --> 00:04:00.110
00:04:00.110 --> 00:04:03.463
00:04:03.463 --> 00:04:08.525
00:04:08.525 --> 00:04:09.789
00:04:09.789 --> 00:04:15.092
00:04:15.092 --> 00:04:20.598
00:04:20.598 --> 00:04:24.071
00:04:24.071 --> 00:04:26.605
00:04:26.605 --> 00:04:34.507
00:04:34.507 --> 00:04:38.283
00:04:38.283 --> 00:04:43.093
00:04:43.093 --> 00:04:48.064
00:04:48.064 --> 00:04:50.288
00:04:50.288 --> 00:05:08.264
00:05:08.264 --> 00:05:25.490
00:05:25.490 --> 00:05:31.800
00:05:31.800 --> 00:05:35.149
00:05:35.149 --> 00:05:41.031
00:05:41.031 --> 00:05:41.742
00:05:41.742 --> 00:05:43.651
00:05:43.651 --> 00:05:44.213
00:05:44.213 --> 00:05:46.600
00:05:46.600 --> 00:05:47.723
00:05:48.384 --> 00:05:54.435
00:05:54.435 --> 00:05:58.733
00:05:58.733 --> 00:06:03.166
00:06:03.166 --> 00:06:05.773
00:06:05.773 --> 00:06:12.233
00:06:12.701 --> 00:06:23.375
00:06:23.375 --> 00:06:29.247
00:06:29.247 --> 00:06:35.084
00:06:35.084 --> 00:06:36.447
00:06:36.447 --> 00:06:38.490
00:06:38.490 --> 00:06:42.307
00:06:42.307 --> 00:06:46.749
00:06:46.749 --> 00:06:56.494
00:06:57.000 --> 00:06:59.002
00:06:59.002 --> 00:07:01.047
00:07:01.047 --> 00:07:03.329
00:07:03.329 --> 00:07:05.954
00:07:05.954 --> 00:07:11.127
00:07:11.127 --> 00:07:19.879
00:07:19.879 --> 00:07:23.889
00:07:23.889 --> 00:07:25.312
00:07:25.312 --> 00:07:35.370
00:07:35.822 --> 00:07:37.367
00:07:37.367 --> 00:07:40.370
00:07:40.370 --> 00:07:42.007
00:07:42.007 --> 00:07:44.028
00:07:44.028 --> 00:07:45.720
00:07:45.720 --> 00:07:45.807
00:07:45.807 --> 00:07:46.028
00:07:46.028 --> 00:07:46.548
00:07:46.548 --> 00:07:48.271
00:07:48.271 --> 00:07:50.452
00:07:50.793 --> 00:07:54.624
00:07:54.624 --> 00:07:59.083
00:07:59.083 --> 00:08:01.286
00:08:01.286 --> 00:08:08.245
00:08:08.245 --> 00:08:14.086
00:08:14.086 --> 00:08:17.372
00:08:17.939 --> 00:08:23.413
00:08:23.413 --> 00:08:25.908
00:08:25.908 --> 00:08:27.314
00:08:27.314 --> 00:08:28.016
00:08:28.016 --> 00:08:33.530
00:08:33.530 --> 00:08:37.206
00:08:37.768 --> 00:08:40.581
00:08:40.581 --> 00:08:44.111
00:08:44.111 --> 00:08:46.157
00:08:46.157 --> 00:08:50.528
00:08:50.528 --> 00:08:51.611
00:08:51.611 --> 00:08:52.923
00:08:52.923 --> 00:08:56.211
00:08:56.211 --> 00:09:00.451
00:09:00.451 --> 00:09:12.313
00:09:12.313 --> 00:09:17.192
00:09:17.919 --> 00:09:18.562
00:09:18.562 --> 00:09:19.186
00:09:19.186 --> 00:09:24.183
00:09:24.183 --> 00:09:36.143
00:09:36.143 --> 00:09:40.392
00:09:40.392 --> 00:09:45.230
00:09:45.230 --> 00:09:50.046
00:09:50.046 --> 00:09:54.413
00:09:54.413 --> 00:10:07.346
00:10:07.346 --> 00:10:14.082
00:10:14.123 --> 00:10:21.187
00:10:21.187 --> 00:10:23.730
00:10:23.730 --> 00:10:39.288
00:10:39.288 --> 00:10:41.392
00:10:41.392 --> 00:10:44.143
00:10:44.143 --> 00:10:48.753
00:10:49.159 --> 00:10:51.703
00:10:51.703 --> 00:10:58.615
00:10:58.615 --> 00:11:02.644
00:11:02.644 --> 00:11:07.625
00:11:07.625 --> 00:11:11.309
00:11:11.309 --> 00:11:16.664
00:11:16.664 --> 00:11:21.073
00:11:21.073 --> 00:11:22.697
00:11:22.697 --> 00:11:26.607
00:11:26.607 --> 00:11:29.452
00:11:29.452 --> 00:11:32.840
00:11:32.840 --> 00:11:39.345
00:11:39.345 --> 00:11:45.200
00:11:45.200 --> 00:11:50.924
00:11:50.924 --> 00:12:05.836
00:12:05.836 --> 00:12:19.028
00:12:19.048 --> 00:12:26.495
00:12:26.495 --> 00:12:30.946
00:12:30.946 --> 00:12:37.480
00:12:37.480 --> 00:12:45.567
00:12:45.567 --> 00:12:49.330
00:12:49.330 --> 00:12:54.945
00:12:54.945 --> 00:12:57.851
00:12:57.971 --> 00:13:01.147
00:13:01.147 --> 00:13:02.831
00:13:02.831 --> 00:13:05.864
00:13:05.864 --> 00:13:06.846
00:13:06.846 --> 00:13:15.783
00:13:15.783 --> 00:13:16.525
00:13:16.525 --> 00:13:26.565
00:13:26.565 --> 00:13:30.000
00:13:30.570 --> 00:13:33.961
00:13:33.961 --> 00:13:42.065
00:13:42.065 --> 00:13:46.581
00:13:46.581 --> 00:13:51.336
00:13:51.336 --> 00:14:02.717
00:14:02.717 --> 00:14:08.941
00:14:10.083 --> 00:14:11.668
00:14:11.668 --> 00:14:21.214
00:14:21.214 --> 00:14:24.418
00:14:24.418 --> 00:14:32.765
00:14:32.765 --> 00:14:41.051
00:14:41.051 --> 00:14:48.116
00:14:48.697 --> 00:15:04.038
00:15:04.038 --> 00:15:23.120
00:15:23.120 --> 00:15:26.253
00:15:26.253 --> 00:15:31.274
00:15:31.274 --> 00:15:33.480
00:15:33.480 --> 00:15:35.231
00:15:35.231 --> 00:15:38.399
00:15:38.399 --> 00:15:46.917
00:15:46.917 --> 00:15:51.674
00:15:51.674 --> 00:16:01.037
00:16:01.317 --> 00:16:09.297
00:16:09.297 --> 00:16:13.639
00:16:13.639 --> 00:16:16.571
00:16:16.571 --> 00:16:31.432
00:16:31.493 --> 00:16:36.913
00:16:36.913 --> 00:16:38.878
00:16:38.878 --> 00:16:41.892
00:16:41.892 --> 00:16:48.899
00:16:48.899 --> 00:16:54.735
00:16:54.735 --> 00:16:58.662
00:16:58.662 --> 00:17:01.153
00:17:01.153 --> 00:17:02.998
00:17:03.398 --> 00:17:23.587
00:17:23.587 --> 00:17:27.442
00:17:27.442 --> 00:17:35.573
00:17:35.573 --> 00:17:36.596
00:17:36.596 --> 00:17:39.125
00:17:39.125 --> 00:17:41.413
00:17:41.413 --> 00:17:43.760
00:17:44.309 --> 00:17:51.551
00:17:51.551 --> 00:17:57.211
00:17:57.211 --> 00:18:01.521
00:18:01.521 --> 00:18:08.714
00:18:08.714 --> 00:18:14.693
00:18:14.693 --> 00:18:17.759
00:18:17.759 --> 00:18:24.800
00:18:24.800 --> 00:18:31.000
00:18:31.000 --> 00:18:35.978
00:18:35.978 --> 00:18:38.018
00:18:38.210 --> 00:18:40.880
00:18:40.880 --> 00:18:44.474
00:18:44.474 --> 00:18:57.911
00:18:57.911 --> 00:19:00.336
00:19:00.336 --> 00:19:02.521
00:19:02.521 --> 00:19:09.997
00:19:10.569 --> 00:19:16.598
00:19:16.598 --> 00:19:17.951
00:19:17.951 --> 00:19:19.311
00:19:19.311 --> 00:19:21.313
00:19:21.313 --> 00:19:23.013
00:19:23.013 --> 00:19:31.780
00:19:32.421 --> 00:19:35.923
00:19:35.923 --> 00:19:41.646
00:19:41.646 --> 00:19:49.672
00:19:49.672 --> 00:19:52.155
00:19:52.155 --> 00:19:57.265
00:19:57.265 --> 00:20:02.277
00:20:02.277 --> 00:20:13.076
00:20:13.630 --> 00:20:21.269